Age and Aspirin Dosing in Secondary Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease

Author:

Marquis‐Gravel Guillaume12ORCID,Stebbins Amanda1ORCID,Wruck Lisa M.1ORCID,Roe Matthew T.13ORCID,Effron Mark B.4ORCID,Hammill Bradley G.15ORCID,Whittle Jeff67ORCID,VanWormer Jeffrey J.8ORCID,Robertson Holly R.9,Alikhaani Jacqueline D.10,Kripalani Sunil11,Farrehi Peter M.12ORCID,Girotra Saket13ORCID,Benziger Catherine P.14ORCID,Polonsky Tamar S.15ORCID,Merritt J. Greg16,Gupta Kamal17ORCID,McCormick Thomas E.18,Knowlton Kirk U.19ORCID,Jain Sandeep K.20ORCID,Kochar Ajar1ORCID,Rothman Russell L.11ORCID,Harrington Robert A.21ORCID,Hernandez Adrian F.13ORCID,Jones W. Schuyler13ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Duke Clinical Research Institute Durham NC

2. Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal QC Canada

3. Duke University Medical Center Durham NC

4. Ochsner Clinical School, John Ochsner Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Queensland School of Medicine New Orleans LA

5. Department of Population Health Sciences Duke School of Medicine Durham NC

6. Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine Medical College of Wisconsin Milwaukee WI

7. Center for Advancing Population Science, Medical College of Wisconsin Milwaukee WI

8. Marshfield Clinic Research Institute Marshfield WI

9. Medidata, A Dassault Systèmes Company New York NY

10. pSCANNER, University of California in Los Angeles Center Los Angeles CA

11. Vanderbilt Institute for Medicine and Public Health Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville TN

12. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine University of Michigan Ann Arbor MI

13. University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine and Comprehensive Access and Delivery Research and Evaluation, Iowa City Veterans Affairs Medical Center Iowa City IA

14. Essentia Health Duluth MN

15. University of Chicago IL

16. Patient‐Centered Network of Learning Health Systems (LHSNet) Ann Arbor MI

17. University of Kansas Medical Center and Hospital KS

18. Johns Hopkins Medical Center Baltimore MD

19. Intermountain Medical Center Salt Lake City UT

20. University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, UPMC Heart and Vascular Institute Pittsburgh PA

21. Department of Medicine Stanford University Stanford CA

Abstract

Background In patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, increasing age is concurrently associated with higher risks of ischemic and bleeding events. The objectives are to determine the impact of aspirin dose on clinical outcomes according to age in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Methods and Results In the ADAPTABLE (Aspirin Dosing: A Patient‐Centric Trial Assessing Benefits and Long‐Term Effectiveness) trial, patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease were randomized to daily aspirin doses of 81 mg or 325 mg. The primary effectiveness end point was death from any cause, hospitalization for myocardial infarction, or hospitalization for stroke. The primary safety end point was hospitalization for bleeding requiring transfusion. A total of 15 076 participants were randomized to aspirin 81 mg (n=7540) or 325 mg (n=7536) daily (median follow‐up: 26.2 months; interquartile range: 19.0–34.9 months). Median age was 67.6 years (interquartile range: 60.7–73.6 years). Among participants aged <65 years (n=5841 [38.7%]), a primary end point occurred in 226 (7.54%) in the 81 mg group, and in 191 (6.80%) in the 325 mg group (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.23 [95% CI, 1.01–1.49]). Among participants aged ≥65 years (n=9235 [61.3%]), a primary end point occurred in 364 (7.12%) in the 81 mg group, and in 378 (7.96%) in the 325 mg group (adjusted HR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.82–1.10]). The age–dose interaction was not significant ( P =0.559). There was no significant interaction between age and the randomized aspirin dose for the secondary effectiveness and the primary safety bleeding end points ( P >0.05 for all). Conclusions Age does not modify the impact of aspirin dosing (81 mg or 325 mg daily) on clinical end points in secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3