Supporting the Heterogeneous and Evolving Treatment Preferences of Patients With Heart Failure Through Collaborative Home‐Based Palliative Care

Author:

Campos Erin1,Isenberg Sarina R.234ORCID,Lovblom Leif Erik5ORCID,Mak Susanna167ORCID,Steinberg Leah468,Bush Shirley H.239ORCID,Goldman Russell810ORCID,Graham Cassandra1,Kavalieratos Dio11ORCID,Stukel Therese12,Tanuseputro Peter2391213ORCID,Quinn Kieran L.1681012ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medicine University of Toronto Toronto Ontario

2. Bruyère Research Institute Ottawa Ontario

3. Department of Medicine University of Ottawa Ottawa Ontario

4. Department of Family and Community Medicine University of Toronto Toronto Ontario

5. Lunenfeld‐Tanenbaum Research Institute Toronto Ontario

6. Department of Medicine Sinai Health System Toronto Ontario

7. Division of Cardiology Sinai Health System Toronto Ontario

8. Interdepartmental Division of Palliative Care Sinai Health System Toronto Ontario

9. Ottawa Hospital Research Institute University of Ottawa Ottawa Ontario

10. Temmy Latner Centre for Palliative Care Toronto Ontario

11. Division of Palliative Medicine Emory University School of Medicine Atlanta Georgia

12. ICES Toronto Ontario

13. ICES Ottawa Ontario

Abstract

Background We characterized the treatment preferences, care setting, and end‐of‐life outcomes among patients with advanced heart failure supported by a collaborative home‐based model of palliative care. Methods and results This decedent cohort study included 250 patients with advanced heart failure who received collaborative home‐based palliative care for a median duration of 1.9 months of follow‐up in Ontario, Canada, from April 2013 to July 2019. Patients were categorized into 1 of 4 groups according to their initial treatment preferences. Outcomes included location of death (out of hospital versus in hospital), changes in treatment preferences, and health service use. Among patients who initially prioritized quantity of life, 21 of 43 (48.8%) changed their treatment preferences during follow‐up (mean 0.28 changes per month). The majority of these patients changed their preferences to avoid hospitalization and focus on comfort at home (19 of 24 changes, 79%). A total of 207 of 250 (82.8%) patients experienced an out‐of‐hospital death. Patients who initially prioritized quantity of life had decreased odds of out‐of‐hospital death (versus in‐hospital death; adjusted odds ratio, 0.259 [95% CI, 0.097–0.693]) and more frequent hospitalizations (mean 0.45 hospitalizations per person‐month) compared with patients who initially prioritized quality of life at home. Conclusions Our results yield a more detailed understanding of the interaction of advanced care planning and patient preferences. Shared decision making for personalized treatment is dynamic and can be enacted earlier than at the very end of life.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3