Procedural Characteristics of Intravascular Ultrasound–Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Their Clinical Implications

Author:

Lee Seung‐Yul1ORCID,Zhang Jun‐Jie2ORCID,Mintz Gary S.3,Hong Sung‐Jin4ORCID,Ahn Chul‐Min4ORCID,Kim Jung‐Sun4ORCID,Kim Byeong‐Keuk4ORCID,Ko Young‐Guk4ORCID,Choi Donghoon4ORCID,Jang Yangsoo5ORCID,Kan Jing2,Pan Tao2,Gao Xiaofei2,Ge Zhen2,Chen Shao‐Liang2,Hong Myeong‐Ki4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Regional Cardiocerebrovascular CenterWonkwang University Hospital Iksan Korea

2. Nanjing First HospitalNanjing Medical University Nanjing China

3. Cardiovascular Research Foundation New York NY

4. Severance Cardiovascular HospitalYonsei University College of Medicine Seoul Korea

5. CHA University College of Medicine Seongnam Korea

Abstract

Background Despite the clinical benefits to intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), most patients with coronary artery disease undergo angiography‐guided PCI alone in the real‐world setting. We sought to investigate the procedural characteristics of IVUS‐guided PCI and their clinical outcomes, as compared with angiography‐guided PCI. Methods and Results This was a cohort study using patient‐level data from the IVUS‐XPL (Impact of Intravascular Ultrasound Guidance on the Outcomes of Xience Prime Stents in Long Lesions) and ULTIMATE (Intravascular Ultrasound Guided Drug Eluting Stents Implantation in All‐Comers Coronary Lesions) clinical trials. A total of 2848 patients with 3872 native coronary lesions were included and procedural characteristics assessed by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) were compared between IVUS and angiography guidance. Stent‐to‐reference vessel diameter ratio (ie, QCA stent sizing) was greater (1.11±0.16 versus 1.07±0.14, P <0.001) and high‐pressure postdilation was more frequently performed (83.7% versus 75.4%, P <0.001) with IVUS guidance, whereas residual stent edge dissections were more frequent in lesions treated with IVUS guidance (4.6% versus 0.7%, P <0.001). Given the dissection risk, optimal QCA stent sizing for IVUS guidance was a stent‐to‐QCA reference vessel diameter ratio ≥1.1 to <1.3. Among 1424 patients (1969 lesions) treated with angiography guidance, QCA stent sizing <1.0 was observed in 651 (33.1%) lesions, while QCA stent sizing ≥1.1 to <1.3 was observed in only 526 (26.7%) lesions. Under angiography guidance, patients with both QCA stent sizing ≥1.1 to <1.3 and high‐pressure postdilation (235 of 1424, 16.5%) had a lower risk of 3‐year target lesion failure compared with others (hazard ratio, 0.532; 95% CI, 0.293–0.966 [ P =0.038]). Conclusions IVUS‐guided PCI resulted in larger QCA‐assessed stent sizing and more frequent postdilation with high‐pressure inflations. These procedures may further improve long‐term clinical outcomes in patients undergoing PCI without IVUS. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT01308281 (IVUS‐XPL); NCT02215915 (ULTIMATE).

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3