Use of Nonrecommended Drugs in Patients With Brugada Syndrome: A Danish Nationwide Cohort Study

Author:

Jespersen Camilla H. B.1ORCID,Krøll Johanna1ORCID,Bhardwaj Priya1ORCID,Hansen Carl Johann1ORCID,Svane Jesper1ORCID,Winkel Bo G.1ORCID,Jøns Christian1ORCID,Jacobsen Peter Karl1ORCID,Haarbo Jens2,Nielsen Jens Cosedis34ORCID,Johansen Jens Brock5ORCID,Philbert Berit T.1ORCID,Riahi Sam6ORCID,Torp‐Pedersen Christian78ORCID,Køber Lars1ORCID,Tfelt‐Hansen Jacob19ORCID,Weeke Peter E.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Cardiology, The Heart Centre Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet København Denmark

2. Department of Cardiology Copenhagen University Hospital ‐ Herlev and Gentofte Hellerup Denmark

3. Department of Cardiology Aarhus University Hospital Aarhus Denmark

4. Department of Clinical Medicine Aarhus University Aarhus Denmark

5. Department of Cardiology Odense University Hospital Odense Denmark

6. Department of Cardiology Aalborg University Hospital Aalborg Denmark

7. Department of Cardiology Nordsjaellands Hospital Hillerød Denmark

8. Department of Public Health University of Copenhagen København Denmark

9. Department of Forensic Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences University of Copenhagen København Denmark

Abstract

Background Patients with Brugada syndrome (BrS) are recommended to avoid drugs that may increase their risk of arrhythmic events. We examined treatment with such drugs in patients with BrS after their diagnosis. Methods and Results All Danish patients diagnosed with BrS (2006–2018) with >12 months of follow‐up were identified from nationwide registries. Nonrecommended BrS drugs were grouped into drugs to “avoid” or “preferably avoid” according to http://www.brugadadrugs.org . Cox proportional hazards analyses were performed to identify factors associated with any nonrecommended BrS drug use, and logistic regression analyses were performed to examine associated risk of appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy, mortality, and a combined end point indicating an arrhythmic event of delayed implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation, appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy, and mortality. During a median follow‐up of 6.8 years, 93/270 (34.4%) patients with BrS (70.4% male, median age at diagnosis 46.1 years [interquartile range, 32.6–57.4]) were treated with ≥1 nonrecommended BrS drugs. No difference in any nonrecommended BrS drug use was identified comparing time before BrS diagnosis (12.6%) with each of the 5 years following BrS diagnosis ( P >0.05). Factors associated with any nonrecommended BrS drug use after diagnosis were female sex (hazard ratio [HR]) 1.83 [95% CI, 1.15–2.90]), psychiatric disease (HR, 3.63 [1.89–6.99]), and prior use of any nonrecommended BrS drug (HR, 4.76 [2.45–9.25]). No significant association between any nonrecommended BrS drug use and implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy (n=20/97, odds ratio [OR], 0.7 [0.2–2.4]), mortality (n=10/270, OR, 3.4 [0.7–19.6]), or the combined end point (n=38/270, OR, 1.7 [0.8–3.7]) was identified. Conclusions One in 3 patients with BrS were treated with a nonrecommended BrS drug after BrS diagnosis, and a BrS diagnosis did not change prescription patterns. More awareness of nonrecommended drug use among patients with BrS is needed.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3