Affiliation:
1. Biomechanics and Biomaterials Design Laboratory School of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering The University of Oklahoma Norman OK United States
2. Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center Oklahoma City OK United States
3. Department of Neurological Surgery Indiana University School of Medicine Indianapolis IN United States
4. Department of BioengineeringUniversity of California, RiversideRiverside CA United States
Abstract
Background
Currently, endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms is limited by low complete occlusion rates. The advent of novel endovascular technology has expanded the applicability of endovascular therapies; however, the superiority of novel embolic devices over the traditional Guglielmi detachable coils is still debated. We performed a systematic review of literature that reported the Raymond–Roy occlusion classification (RROC) rates of modern endovascular devices to determine their immediate and follow‐up occlusion effectivenesses for the treatment of unruptured saccular intracranial aneurysms.
Methods
A search was conducted using electronic databases (PUBMED, Cochrane, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Web of Science). We retrieved studies published between 2000 and 2022, reporting immediate and follow‐up RROC rates of subjects treated with different endovascular intracranial aneurysm therapies. We extracted demographic information of the treated patients and their reported angiographic RROC rates.
Results
A total of 80 studies from 15 countries were included for data extraction. The RROC rates determined from angiogram were obtained for 21 331 patients (72.5% women, pooled mean age: 58.2 [95% CI]: 56.8–59.6), harboring 22 791 aneurysms. The most frequent aneurysm locations were the internal carotid artery (46.4%, 95% CI: 41.9%–50.9%), the anterior communicating artery (26.4%, 95% CI: 22.5%–30.8%), the middle cerebral artery (24.5%, 95% CI: 19.2%–30.8%), and the basilar tip (14.4%, 95% CI: 11.3%–18.3%). The
complete
occlusion probability (RROC‐I) was analyzed for Guglielmi detachable coils, the Woven EndoBridge, and flow diverters. The RROC‐I rate was the highest in balloon‐assisted coiling (73.9%, 95% CI: 65.0%–81.2%) and the lowest in the Woven EndoBridge (27.8%, 95% CI: 13.2%–49.2%). The follow‐up RROC‐I probability was homogenous in all analyzed devices.
Conclusion
We observed that the coil‐based endovascular therapy provides acceptable rates of complete occlusion, and these rates are improved in balloon‐assisted coils. Out of the analyzed devices, the Woven EndoBridge exhibited the shortest time to achieve >90% probability of follow‐up complete occlusion (∼18 months). Overall, the Guglielmi detachable coils remain the
gold standard
for endovascular treatment of unruptured saccular aneurysms.
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)