Affiliation:
1. From the Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine Unit, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium (M.P., C.A., J-L.T.); and the Salvatore Maugeri Foundation, IRCCS, the Unità di Ricerca, Valutazione Funzionale e Verifica di Qualità in Riabilitazione (L.T.), and Divisione di Recupero e Rieducazione Funzionale (L.T., A.Z.), Pavia, Italy.
Abstract
Background and Purpose
—Chronic hemiparetic patients often retain the ability to manage activities requiring both hands, either through the use of the affected arm or compensation with the unaffected limb. A measure of this overall ability was developed by adapting and validating the ABILHAND questionnaire through the Rasch measurement model. ABILHAND measures the patient’s perceived difficulty in performing everyday manual activities.
Methods
—One hundred three chronic (>6 months) stroke outpatients (62% men; mean age, 63 years) were assessed (74 in Belgium, 29 in Italy). They lived at home and walked independently and were screened for the absence of major cognitive deficits (dementia, aphasia, hemineglect). The patients were administered the ABILHAND questionnaire, the Brunnström upper limb motricity test, the box-and-block manual dexterity test, the Semmes-Weinstein tactile sensation test, and the Geriatric Depression Scale. The brain lesion type and site were recorded. ABILHAND results were analyzed with the use of Winsteps Rasch software.
Results
—The Rasch refinement of ABILHAND led to a change from the original unimanual and bimanual 56-item, 4-level scale to a bimanual 23-item, 3-level scale. The resulting ability scale had sufficient sensitivity to be clinically useful. Rasch reliability was 0.90, and the item-difficulty hierarchy was stable across demographic and clinical subgroups. Grip strength, motricity, dexterity, and depression were significantly correlated with the ABILHAND measures.
Conclusions
—The ABILHAND questionnaire results in a valid person-centered measure of manual ability in everyday activities. The stability of the item-difficulty hierarchy across different patient classes further supports the clinical application of the scale.
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Subject
Advanced and Specialized Nursing,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Neurology (clinical)
Reference38 articles.
1. Stroke
2. Mathiowetz V Weber K Volland G Kashman N. Reliability and validity of pinch and grip strength evaluations. J Hand Surg . 1984;9A:222–226.
3. Adult Norms for the Box and Block Test of Manual Dexterity
4. Bell-Krotoski JA. Light touch–deep pressure testing using Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments. In: Hunter JM Schneider LH Mackin EJ Callahan AD eds. Rehabilitation of the Hand: Surgery and Therapy . St Louis Mo: Mosby Co; 1990:585–593.
5. World Health Organization. International Classification of Impairments Disabilities and Handicaps . Geneva Switzerland: WHO; 1980.
Cited by
230 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献