Hemodynamic Effects of Carotid Endarterectomy by Magnetic Resonance Flow Quantification

Author:

Vanninen Ritva1,Koivisto Keijo1,Tulla Harri1,Manninen Hannu1,Partanen Kaarina1

Affiliation:

1. From the Departments of Clinical Radiology (R.V., H.M., K.P.), Neurology (K.K.), and Surgery (H.T.), Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.

Abstract

Background and Purpose Blood flow can be evaluated noninvasively using magnetic resonance phase-contrast flow quantification. The purpose of this prospective study was to assess the feasibility of this method and to evaluate the hemodynamic effects of carotid endarterectomy. Methods Volumetric flow rates and peak systolic velocities of the internal and common carotid and the vertebral arteries were measured by magnetic resonance flow quantification. Sixteen patients undergoing 18 endarterectomies had complete flow data recorded preoperatively and 3 days after surgery. Results The inverse correlation between the angiographic stenosis degree and the preoperative flow rate in the corresponding internal carotid artery was highly significant ( r =−.69, P <.001). After endarterectomy, the mean flow in the ipsilateral internal carotid artery improved from 143 to 233 mL/min ( P <.001). The mean peak systolic velocity increased from 23 to 37 cm/s ( P <.001). No significant changes were seen in the contralateral carotid or the vertebral arteries. The mean total blood flow improved by 81 mL/min ( P =.08). In the severely stenosed bifurcations (70% to 99%, n=11), the flow rate improved by 106 mL/min and in the moderately (30% to 69%, n=4) or mildly (<30%, n=3) stenosed bifurcations by 63 mL/min. If the contralateral carotid artery was occluded or severely stenosed, the improvement was 164 mL/min. Conclusions Magnetic resonance flow quantification provides a useful tool for the follow-up of the hemodynamic effects of carotid endarterectomy. Our results indicate that surgery is followed by a significant increase of blood flow in the ipsilateral carotid artery and that there appear to be differences in flow increase between subgroups of patients with different degrees of stenosis.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Advanced and Specialised Nursing,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Clinical Neurology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3