Comparison Between Echo Contrast Agent-Specific Imaging Modes and Perfusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Assessment of Brain Perfusion

Author:

Meves Saskia H.1,Wilkening Wilko1,Thies Tammo1,Eyding Jens1,Hölscher Thilo1,Finger Michael1,Schmid Gebhard1,Ermert Helmut1,Postert Thomas1

Affiliation:

1. From the Departments of Neurology (S.H.M., T.T., J.E., M.F., T.P.), Electrical Engineering (W.W., H.E.), and Radiology (G.S.), Ruhr University, Bochum, and Department of Neurology, University Regensburg, Regensburg (T.H.), Germany.

Abstract

Background and Purpose— Contrast burst imaging (CBI) and time variance imaging (TVI) are new ultrasonic imaging modes enabling the visualization of intravenously injected echo contrast agents in brain parenchyma. The aim of this study was to compare the quantitative ultrasonic data with corresponding perfusion-weighted MRI data (p-MRI) with respect to the assessment of brain perfusion. Methods— Twelve individuals with no vascular abnormalities were examined by CBI and TVI after an intravenous bolus injection of 4 g galactose-based microbubble suspension (Levovist) in a concentration of 400 mg/mL. Complementary, a dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI, ie, p-MRI, of each individual was obtained. In both ultrasound (US) methods and p-MRI, time-intensity curves were calculated offline, and absolute time to peak intensities (TPI), peak intensities (PI), and peak width (PW) of US investigations and TPI, relative cerebral blood flow (CBF) and relative cerebral blood volume (CBV) of p-MRI examinations were determined in the following regions of interest (ROIs): lentiform nucleus (LN), white matter (WM), posterior (PT), and anterior thalamus (AT). In addition, the M 2 segment of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) was evaluated in the US, and the precentral gyrus (PG) was examined in the p-MRI examinations. In relation to a reference parenchymal ROI (AT), relative TPIs were compared between the US and p-MRI methods and relative PI of US investigations with the ratio of CBF (rCBF) of p-MRI examinations in identical ROIs. Results— Mean TPIs varied from 18.3±5.0 (AT) to 20.1± 5.8 (WM) to 17.2±4.9 (MCA) seconds in CBI examinations and from 19.4±5.3 (AT) to 20.4±4.3 (WM) to 17.3±4.0 (MCA) seconds in TVI examinations. Mean PIs were found to vary from 581.9±342.4 (WM) to 1522.9±574.2 (LN) to 3400.9± 621.7 arbitrary units (MCA) in CBI mode and from 7.5±4.6 (WM) to 17.5±4.9 (LN) to 46.3±7.1 (MCA) arbitrary units in TVI mode. PW ranged from 7.3±4.5 (AT) to 9.1±4.0 (LN) to 24.3±12.8 (MCA) seconds in CBI examinations and from 7.1±3.9 (AT) to 8.7±3.5 (LN) to 26.7±18.2 (MCA) seconds in TVI examinations. Mean TPI was significantly shorter and mean PI and mean PW were significantly higher in the MCA compared with all other ROIs ( P <0.05). Mean TPI of the p-MRI examinations ranged from 22.0±6.9 (LN) to 23.0±6.8 (WM) seconds; mean CBF ranged from 0.0093± 0.0041 (LN) to 0.0043±0.0021 (WM). There was no significant difference in rTPI in any ROI between US and p-MRI measurements ( P >0.2), whereas relative PIs were significantly higher in areas with lower insonation depth such as the LN compared with rCBF. Conclusions— In contrast to PI, TPI and rTPI in US techniques are robust parameters for the evaluation of cerebral perfusion and may help to differentiate physiological and pathological perfusion in different parenchymal regions of the brain.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Advanced and Specialised Nursing,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Clinical Neurology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3