Eliciting Information on Differential Sensation of Heat in Those With and Without Poststroke Aphasia Using a Visual Analogue Scale

Author:

Korner-Bitensky Nicol1,Kehayia Eva1,Tremblay Nicole1,Mazer Barbara1,Singer Fanny1,Tarasuk Jill1

Affiliation:

1. From the Faculty of Medicine (N.K.-B., E.K., B.M.), School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Centre de Recherche Interdisciplinaire en Réadaptation du Montréal Métropolitain (N.K.-B., E.K., B.M., F.S., J.T.), Jewish Rehabilitation Hospital Site, Laval, Quebec, Canada; and Centre Intégré Sur le Cancer du Sein (N.T.), Pavillon Le Royer, Montréal, Québec, Canada.

Abstract

Background and Purpose— Aphasia can result in an inability to communicate the presence, location, or intensity of pain. Although visual analogue scales (VASs) exist, it is unknown whether they are useful in assessing pain in individuals with aphasia. The objective was to determine whether those with poststroke aphasia could respond differentially to thermal stimuli of varying intensities using a standardized VAS. Methods— Five groups of participants were assessed: those without stroke, those with stroke but without aphasia, and 3 groups with varying degrees of aphasia. A 10-cm vertical VAS was used to measure responses to varying thermal intensities delivered on the participant’s forearm. Results— Across all 5 groups, a similar proportion demonstrated ability to discriminate between 2 temperatures (χ 2 =1.899; P =0.75). When presented with 4 temperatures, all groups performed more poorly, yet with similar success rates across groups (χ 2 =0.1267; P =0.88). The repeated-measures ANOVA revealed no effect of group but a significant effect of temperature ( P <0.0001). Conclusion— A VAS may be useful in clinical identification of differing intensities of stimuli in a substantial proportion of those with aphasia.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Advanced and Specialized Nursing,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Neurology (clinical)

Cited by 30 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3