Estimation of the End of Ejection in Aortic Stenosis

Author:

Bermejo Javier1,Rojo-Álvarez José Luis1,Antoranz J. Carlos1,Abel Monica1,Burwash Ian G.1,Yotti Raquel1,Moreno Mar1,García-Fernández Miguel A.1,Lehmann Kenneth G.1,Otto Catherine M.1

Affiliation:

1. From the Department of Cardiology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain (J.B., R.Y., M.M., M.A.G.-F.); Department of Signal Theory and Communications, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Madrid, Spain (J.L.R.-A.); Department of Mathematical Physics and Fluids, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia, Madrid, Spain (J.C.A.); Division of Cardiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, and...

Abstract

Background— All indices of aortic stenosis (AS) rely on measurements of mean transvalvular pressure gradient ( ΔP ) and flow rate. Because the gradient is reversed during late ejection, the late systolic left ventricular (LV)–aortic pressure crossover may be an erroneous landmark of end-ejection. The aortic incisura should be a better reference to calculate indices of AS invasively. Methods and Results— The accuracy of the pressure crossover and the incisura to define end-ejection was assessed in a chronic AS experimental model (9 dogs) with the use of an implantable flowmeter and Doppler echocardiography as reference. In 288 hemodynamic recordings analyzed (aortic valve area [AVA]: 0.74±0.46 cm 2 ), ejection ended 37±29 ms after the pressure crossover but almost simultaneously with the incisura (2±17 ms). Pressure crossover error accounted for significant errors in the measurement of ΔP (95% limits of agreement, +0 to +7 mm Hg) and AVA (−0.1 to +0.2 cm 2 ). These errors were reduced to less than half with the use of the incisura to define end-ejection. Additionally, the agreement with Doppler-derived AS indices was best with use of the incisura. Pressure crossover error was maximal in situations of higher output, moderate orifice narrowing, higher arterial compliance, and lower vascular resistance. In 32 consecutive patients undergoing cardiac catheterization for AS, the pressure crossover induced a clinically important overestimation of the ΔP from +22 to +50%. Errors in AVA estimation were considerably smaller (−2% to +6%) because of simultaneous and offsetting errors in the measurements of ΔP and flow. Conclusions— The aortic incisura and not the second pressure crossover should be used to obtain invasive indices of AS.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Reference28 articles.

1. Hydraulic formula for calculation of the area of the stenotic mitral valve, other cardiac valves, and central circulatory shunts. I

2. Wilson RF. Catheterization of patients with aortic valve disease. In: Emery RW Arom KV eds. The Aortic Valve. Philadelphia Pa: Hanley and Belfus Inc; 1991: 57–78.

3. Lange RA Hillis LD. Cardiac catheterization and hemodynamic assessment. In: Topol EJ ed. Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine. 2nd ed. Philadelphia Pa: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2002: 1957–1976.

4. Kern MJ Deligonul U Donohue EC et al. Hemodynamic data. In: Kern MJ ed. The Cardiac Catheterization Handbook. 2nd ed. St Louis Mo: Mosby; 1995: 108–207.

Cited by 21 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3