Derivation and Validation of a Modified Short Form of the Stroke Impact Scale

Author:

MacIsaac Rachael1,Ali Myzoon1,Peters Michele2,English Coralie3,Rodgers Helen4,Jenkinson Crispin2,Lees Kennedy R.1,Quinn Terence J.1,

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, UK

2. Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, UK

3. School of Health Sciences, University of Newcastle, Australia

4. Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK

Abstract

Background The Stroke Impact Scale ( SIS ) is a stroke‐specific, quality of life measure recommended for research and clinical practice. Completion rates are suboptimal and could relate to test burden. We derived and validated a short form SIS (SF‐SIS). Methods and Results We examined data from the Virtual International Stroke Trial Archive, generating derivation and validation populations. We derived an SFSIS by selecting 1 item per domain of SIS , choosing items most highly correlated with total domain score. Our validation described agreement of SFSIS with original SIS and the SIS ‐16 and correlation with Barthel Index, modified Rankin Scale, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, and Euro‐QoL 5 dimensions visual analog scales. We assessed discriminative validity (associations between SFSIS and factors known to influence outcome [age, physiological parameters, and comorbidity]). We assessed face validity and acceptability by sharing the SFSIS with a focus group of stroke survivors and multidisciplinary stroke healthcare staff. From 5549 acute study patients (mean age 68.5 [ SD 13] years, mean SIS 64 [ SD 32]) and 332 rehabilitation patients (mean age 65.7 [ SD 11] years, mean SIS 61 [ SD 11]), we derived an 8‐item SFSIS that demonstrated good agreement with original SIS and good correlation with our chosen functional and quality of life measures (all ρ>0.70, P <0.0001). Significant associations were seen with our chosen predictors of stroke outcome in the acute group ( P <0.0001). The focus group agreed with the choice of items for SFSIS across 7 of 8 domains . Conclusions Using multiple, complementary methods, we have derived an SF‐ SIS and demonstrated content, convergent, and discriminant validity. This shortened SIS should allow collection of robust quality of life data with less associated test burden.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3