Sporda Gözlemsel Kolektif Yeterlik Ölçeği: Türkçe Formunun Geçerlik ve GÜvenirlik Çalışması-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Sporda Gözlemsel Kolektif Yeterlik Ölçeği: Türkçe Formunun Geçerlik ve GÜvenirlik Çalışması

Published:2023-01-31 Issue:1 Volume:28 Page:55-62
ISSN:2717-9966
Container-title:Gazi Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

ŞENEL Ender¹^ORCID,YILDIZ Mevlüt²^ORCID,GÖRGÜLÜ Recep³^ORCID,ADİLOĞULLARI İlhan⁴^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. MUĞLA SITKI KOÇMAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ, SPOR BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ

2. MUGLA SITKI KOCMAN UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF SPORTS SCIENCES

3. BURSA ULUDAG UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF SPORTS SCIENCE

4. CANAKKALE ONSEKIZ MART UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF SPORTS SCIENCE

Abstract

The study aimed to analyze the Observational Collective Efficacy Scale for Sport (OCESS). 242 Turkish athletes and 85 Turkish coaches participated in the study. After performing the first step for the language validity of the scale by using the translation-back translation method, it was sent to the athletes as an online form. Athletes responded to the items voluntarily. KMO and Bartlett’s test of sphericity values were calculated to determine whether the data was proper for factor analysis. The initial factor structure of the scale was tested with CFA. While the Pearson correlation test was used for criterion-related validity, the internal consistency coefficient was calculated with Cronbach’s alpha. While KMO was found to be 0.84, Bartlett’s test of sphericity was statistically significant. The item factor loadings ranged between 0.64 and 0.88. In sum, the Turkish version of the OCESS presents acceptable psychometric properties and may be used to assess athletes’ collective efficacy beliefs in team sports repeatedly.

Publisher

Gazi University

Reference30 articles.

1. 1. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.

2. 2. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. NJ: Englewood Cliffs.

3. 3. Bandura, A. (2000). Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(3), 75-78.

4. 4. Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 25(24), 3186-3191.

5. 5. Dithurbide, L., & Feltz, D. L. (2012). Self-efficacy and collective efficacy. Measurement in sport and exercise psychology, In Tenenbaum, G. E., Eklund, R. C., & Kamata, A. E. (Eds.), Measurement in sport and exercise psychology, (p. 251-263). Champaign: Human Kinetics.