Abstract
This paper examines the history and language of Canadian immigration statues and House of Commons debates regarding immigrants with mental disabilities from the time of Confederation to the 1920s. This paper posits that a study of the historical language and legal frameworks regarding immigrants with mental "disorders" illuminates the myriad of social prejudices about mental disability that have persisted in Canada. The early 20th century laws and House of Commons debates indicate that the exclusion of immigrants with mental disabilities was a deliberate decision on the part of legislators to ensure the proper "character" of immigrants coming to Canada. This paper argues that the representation of mental disability in early immigration legislation, particularly in the context of the growing influence of the field of psychiatry, reveals the historical pervasiveness of social misunderstandings of mental disability.
Publisher
The Ohio State University Libraries
Cited by
17 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. “Mere guesswork”: Clarifying the role of intelligence, mentality, and psychometric testing in the diagnosis of “mental defectives” for sterilization in Alberta from 1929 to 1972.;History of Psychology;2023-11
2. Intersectionality of disability, race, and immigration: disabled faculty, character assassination, and the emergence of territorialism in universities;Whiteness and Education;2023-10-15
3. Disability, Race, and Immigration Intersectionality: Disempowering the Disabled through Institutionalized Ableism in American Higher Education;The Educational Forum;2022-05-12
4. Mediating Capitalism’s ‘Rules of Reproduction’ with Historical Agency;Historical Materialism;2021-09-20
5. Disability, belonging, and inclusive leisure;Loisir et Société / Society and Leisure;2021-05-04