Abstract
The Hungarian administrative law has been significantly impacted by the Covid-19 pandemic. Several rules – which were introduced during the state of danger based on the epidemic situation – have been incorporated into the Hungarian legal system. The administrative procedural law has been influenced by the epidemic transformation. However, the rules on e-administration have not been reformed significantly (due to the digitalisation reforms of the last years), but the rules on administrative licenses and permissions have been amended. The priority of the general code on administrative procedure has been weakened: new, simplified procedure and regime have been introduced. The local self-governance has been impacted by the reforms. The transformation has had two, opposite trends. On the one hand, the Hungarian administrative system became more centralised during the last year: municipal revenues and task performance have been partly centralised. The Hungarian municipal system has been concentrated, as well. The role of the second-tier government, the counties (megye), has been strengthened by the establishment of the special economic (investment) zones. On the other hand, the municipalities could be interpreted as a ‘trash can’ of the Hungarian public administration: they received new, mainly unpopular competences on the restrictions related to the pandemic. Although these changes have been related to the current epidemic situation, it seems, that the ‘legislative background’ of the pandemic offered an opportunity to the central government to pass significant reforms. From 2021 a new phenomenon can be observed: the state of danger has remained, but the majority of the restrictions have been terminated by the Government of Hungary. Therefore, the justification of the state of danger during the summer of 2021 became controversial in Hungarian public discourse.
Publisher
University of Public Service Ludovika University Press
Reference37 articles.
1. Alaimo V., Fajnzylber, P., Guasch, J. L., López, J. H. & Oviedo, A. M. (2009). Behind the Investment Climate: Back to Basics – Determinants of Corruption. In P. Fajnzylber, J. L. Guasch & J. H. López (Eds.), Does the Investment Climate Matter? Microeconomic Foundations of Growth in Latin America. Washington – Basingstoke – New York, the World Bank. Online: https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-7411-5
2. Asbóth, M. D., Fazekas, M. & Koncz, J. (2020). Egészségügyi igazgatás és jog. ELTE Eötvös Kiadó.
3. Barnett, H. (2002). Constitutional and Administrative Law (4th ed.). Cavendish Publishing.
4. Dósa, Á., Hanti, P. & Kovácsy, Zs. (2016). Kommentár az egészségügyi törvényhez. Wolters Kluwer.
5. Drinóczi, T. & Bień-Kacała, A. (2020). COVID-19 in Hungary and Poland: extraordinary situation and illiberal constitutionalism. The Theory and Practice of Legislation, 8(1–2), 171–192. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/20508840.2020.1782109
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献