Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: comparison of medial and lateral approach

Author:

ERÖZKAN Kamil1ORCID,VATANSEVER Safa2ORCID,TAMAM Selim1ORCID,BENK Mehmet Şah1ORCID,AZILI Cem1ORCID,BAYAR Sancar1ORCID,ÜNAL Ali Ekrem1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. ANKARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TIP FAKÜLTESİ, CERRAHİ TIP BİLİMLERİ BÖLÜMÜ, GENEL CERRAHİ ANABİLİM DALI, CERRAHİ ONKOLOJİ BİLİM DALI

2. IZMIR UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS

Abstract

Aim: We aimed to examine the early oncological and clinical outcomes of the medial and lateral approaches for right hemicolectomy. Materials and Methods: Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy patients who underwent medial and lateral approach techniques in our clinic between March 2010 and September 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic data of the patients, tumor, and operation characteristics, operation, clinical, pathological, mortality, and morbidity outcomes were recorded. Data were compared with the Chi-square test or Fisher Exact test according to the expected value for categorical variables. The Mann-Whitney U test was used because the data for continuous variables were not normally distributed. Results: In total, hundred and fourteen patients who underwent laparoscopic right colon resection were included. 47 patients were operated on with the medial approach, and 67 with the lateral approach. In terms of harvested lymph node number, operation time, estimated blood loss, first fluid intake, first solid intake, first flatus, blood transfusion history, length of stay, anastomotic leaks, and mortality were not significantly different between the two approaches (p>0.05). However, the number of positive lymph nodes was significantly higher in the medial approach (p=0.013). Conclusion: The medial and lateral approaches are feasible and effective techniques for right hemicolectomy. There is no difference between the short-term oncologic results. However, randomized controlled studies are needed for long-term results.

Publisher

Ege Journal of Medicine

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3