After submitting our review report on Corman et al. (referred hereinafter as CD-report) andrepublishing it on a scientific preprint server [50] and Researchgate.net [51] we offered thereport for public discussion at cormandrostenreview.com on 27th November 2020. Thescientific community provided additional literature, references, and analyses concerning theCD-report and the Corman et al. manuscript. Several “advocatus diaboli” confronted us withcorrect or assumed problems in our report. The most common critique of the CD-report wasthe lack of “wet lab” experiments to support our concerns over the technical flaws in thePCR protocol.