Pandemics in New South Wales prisons: the more things change…

Author:

Hampton Stephen1,Weston Kathryn M2,McCarthy Louella R3,Mackinnon Tobias4

Affiliation:

1. Executive Medical Director, Justice Health and Forensic Mental Health Network PO Box 150, Matraville New South Wales, 2036, Australia

2. Associate Professor Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, 2522, New South Wales, Australia

3. Associate Professor Community Engagement, School of Medicine, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, 2522, New South Wales, Australia

4. Co-Director Forensic Mental Health, Justice Health and Forensic Mental Health Network PO Box 150, Matraville New South Wales, 2036, Australia

Abstract

Background: The current COVID-19 pandemic is not the first time New South Wales prisons have faced contagion. This paper examines the current responses in New South Wales prisons to the threat of COVID-19 to prisoner health, by contrasting contemporary activities with actions and policy developed during two historical epidemics: the influenza epidemic of 1860 and pandemic of 1919. Method: Epidemiological information relating to cases of disease in NSW prisons during the 1860 and 1919 influenza epidemics was obtained from the Comptroller-General’s reports for the specific outbreak years and for the preceding and succeeding five-year periods. Additional archival sources such as digitised newspaper reports and articles available through the National Library of Australia were analysed for closer detail. The management of these outbreaks was compared to current strategies to mitigate against risk from the COVID-19 pandemic in the NSW prison system. Results: Interesting similarities were discovered in relation to the management of the historic influenza outbreaks in NSW prisons and in the management of the current COVID-19 pandemic. An outbreak of influenza in mid-1860 impacted seven penal institutions in Sydney and Parramatta. Infection rates at these institutions were between 3.1% and 100%; the mean rate was 41.8%. The public health measures employed at the time included allowing ‘air circulation freely night and day’, and treatments that were ‘tonical and stimulatory’. In 1919, the attack rate of influenza infection for Sydney was 358 per 1,000 population, whereas for the two large penitentiaries in Sydney, it was only 26 per 1,000 population. Similarly, the reported death rates were much reduced for prisoners compared to the general community. The recorded measures in 1919 included: disinfecting of the gaol buildings; inoculation (experimental but of no value); the compulsory wearing of masks; the closure of the border between NSW and Victoria; fumigation and inhalation disinfection; daily examination with isolation for symptomatic staff; and quarantine of new arrivals. These are remarkably similar to current strategies. Discussion: While the past 100 or more years have brought huge progress in scientific knowledge, public health approaches remain the mainstay of outbreak management in prisons; and, as in 1919, the opportunity for Australia to observe the rest of the world and plan for action has not been wasted. Prisons pose a potential risk for pandemic spread but they also present a unique opportunity for reducing disease risk by ironic virtue of the ‘separate system’ that was recognised even 100 years ago as characteristic of these institutions.

Publisher

Australian Government Department of Health

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3