Bacterial Ocular Surveillance System (BOSS) Sydney, Australia 2017-2018

Author:

Watson Stephanie L1,Gatus Barrie J2,Cabrera-Aguas Maria1,Armstrong Benjamin H2,George C R Robert3,Khoo Pauline1,Lahra Monica M2

Affiliation:

1. The University of Sydney, Save Sight Institute, Discipline of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Sydney Eye Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia

2. WHOCC for STI and AMR, NSW Health Pathology Microbiology, The Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW, Australia; School of Medical Sciences, University of New South Wales, NSW, Australia

3. NSW Health Pathology Microbiology John Hunter Hospital, NSW, Australia

Abstract

This study investigated antimicrobial resistance (AMR) profiles from a cohort of patients with bacterial keratitis treated at Sydney Eye Hospital, 1 January 2017 – 31 December 2018. These AMR profiles were analysed in the context of the current Australian empiric regimens for topical therapy: ciprofloxacin/ofloxacin monotherapy versus combination therapy of cefalotin/cephazolin plus gentamicin. At our Centre, combinations of (i) chloramphenicol plus gentamicin and (ii) chloramphenicol plus ciprofloxacin are alternatively used, so were also analysed. Three hundred and seventy-four isolates were cultured prospectively: 280/374 (75%) were gram positive, and 94/374 (25%) were gram negative. Coagulase-negative staphylococci comprised 173/374 (46%). Isolates included <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (n = 43/374) 11%; <i>Streptococcus pneumoniae</i> (n = 14/374) 3.7%; and <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> (n = 50/374) 13%. Statistical comparison was performed. There was no significant difference between cover provided either of the current Australian recommendations: ciprofloxacin/ofloxacin vs cefalotin/cephazolin plus gentamicin (5.3% vs 4.8%, respectively; <i>p</i> = 0.655). However, the combination of chloramphenicol plus an anti-pseudomonal agent (ciprofloxacin/ofloxacin or gentamicin) had significantly improved cover. Chloramphenicol plus gentamicin was superior to ciprofloxacin/ofloxacin (1.9% vs 5.3% resistance respectively; <i>p</i> = 0.007), and cefalotin/cephazolin plus gentamicin (1.9% vs 4.8%; <i>p</i> = 0.005). Chloramphenicol plus ciprofloxacin was superior to ciprofloxacin/ofloxacin monotherapy (1.3% vs 5.3%; <i>p</i> ≤ 0.001), and to cefalotin/cephazolin plus gentamicin (1.3% vs 4.8%; <i>p</i> = 0.003). Chloramphenicol plus gentamicin versus chloramphenicol plus ciprofloxacin/ofloxacin were equivalent (<i>p</i> = 0.48). There was no demonstrated in vitro superiority of either the current empiric antibiotic regimens. For our setting, for bacterial keratitis, chloramphenicol in combination offered superior in vitro cover. Broadened surveillance for ocular AMR is urgently needed across jurisdictions.

Publisher

Australian Government Department of Health

Subject

General Medicine

Cited by 14 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3