A Comparison of Florida Medical Examiners’ Reports and Death Certificates for Specific Drug Related Overdose Deaths

Author:

Paulozzi Leonard J.1,Ibrahimova Aybaniz1,Rudd Rose A.1,Goldberger Bruce A.1,Thogmartin Jon R.1,Shelton Kyla1

Affiliation:

1. Division of Unintentional Injury Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA (AI, RR), W.R. Maples Center for Forensic Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL (BG), Pinellas County Forensic Laboratory, Pinellas, FL (JT), Florida Department of Health, Tallahassee, FL (KS).

Abstract

Death certificates are a source of information on deaths caused by specific drugs. However, the completeness of such information has been questioned. This study compared counts in the Florida Medical Examiner Commission's drug related death reporting system (ME) with those from death certificates (DC) for overdose deaths involving selected drugs during 2005-2008 to assess the completeness of death certificate information. DC data indicated 2,401 deaths with benzodiazepines as a cause, 2,182 for cocaine, 2,055 for methadone, and 416 for heroin. The ratios of ME deaths to DC deaths were 1.19 (95% CI 1.13-1.26) for benzodiazepines, 1.38 (95% CI 1.31-1.46) for cocaine, 1.37 (95% CI 1.29-1.44) for methadone, and 0.96 (95% CI 0.83-1.09) for heroin. For each drug, ratios were similar for unintentional (accidental), suicide, and undetermined intent deaths. Ratios varied across the 24 ME districts, but few districts reported significantly fewer deaths in the ME system than in the DC system. Results suggest that surveillance based on death certificate data underestimates specific drug caused deaths as counted by medical examiners in a state with multiple, independent medical examiners. Death certificate data might therefore underestimate drug overdose mortality nationwide.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3