Comparison of the Distribution of Cranial Fractures by Mechanism of Formation

Author:

Atherton Daniel S.1,McGwin Gerald2,Davis Gregory G.3

Affiliation:

1. Jefferson County Coroner/Medical Examiner's Office

2. University of Alabama-Birmingham - School of Public Health

3. University of Alabama-Birmingham - Pathology

Abstract

Different mechanisms can cause bone fractures. This retrospective study considers whether the distribution of cranial fractures can help distinguish the mechanism by which fractures formed. Data are from two sources: cases of motor vehicle collision (MVC) and fire-related deaths obtained from the Jefferson County Coroner/Medical Examiner (JCC/MEO) archives and information on fatal MVCs from the National Automotive Sampling System Crashworthiness Data System (NASS/CDS). In review of the JCC/MEO archives, cranial fractures were documented in 30% of MVC deaths. Fractures were restricted to the base of the skull in 45% of those cases, involved both base and cranial vault in 53%, and was confined to the cranial vault in 2.6%. Cranial fractures were documented in only 4% of deaths involving fire. The NASS/CDS data (n=31 911) are similar, with fracture involving only the base of the skull in 40.9% of cases, both base and vault in 42.3% of cases, and vault only in 16.8% of cases. Cranial fractures in fire-related MVCs vs. non-fire MVCs were more likely to involve the vault only (31.5% vs. 16.9%) and less likely to involve the base and vault (36.4% vs. 45.0%) or base only (32.1% vs. 38.1%). In conclusion, most (>90%) cranial fractures related to MVCs involved the base of the skull. Few deaths only associated with fire were associated with cranial fracture (4%). In circumstances where alternate mechanisms for fracture exist, such as a vehicle catching fire after a collision, fracture of the base of the skull supports the collision as the likely mechanism of fracture.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Reference7 articles.

1. DavyD.T. JepsenK.J. Bone mechanics handbook. Boca Raton: CRC Press; c2001. Chapter 18, Bone damage mechanics; p. 18-1–18-25.

2. DolinakD. MatshesE. LewE. Forensic pathology: principles and practice. 1st ed. San Diego: Academic Press; c2005. Chapter 10. Environmental injury; p. 239–58.

3. DiMaioV.J.M. DimaioD.J. Forensic pathology. 2nd ed. New York: CRC Press; c2001. Chapter 13, Fire deaths; p. 367–88.

4. The Differentiation of Traumatic and Heat-Related Fractures in Burned Bone

5. SpitzW.U. Spitz and Fisher's Medicolegal investigation of death. 4th ed. Springfield (IL): CC Thomas; c2006. Chapter 13, Thermal injuries; p. 747–82.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3