Failed recanalization mediates the association of women with poor outcomes after thrombectomy: a single-center experience

Author:

Lee Seung-Jae,Lee Tae-Kyeong,Moon Ji Eun

Abstract

Background: Whether thrombectomy benefits differ according to sex remains debatable. We aimed to investigate whether there was a difference in stroke outcomes between men and women treated with thrombectomy.Methods: We studied 173 patients with anterior circulation strokes. Failed recanalization was defined as thrombolysis in cerebral infarction grade 0-2a. Scores >2 on the modified Rankin Scale at 3 months were regarded as poor outcomes. To prove that failed recanalization mediated the association between sex differences and functional outcome, the four steps of the reasoning process adapted from Baron and Kenny’s causal-steps approach were tested. The adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Results: This study included 76 women and 97 men. Women were older and presented with atrial fibrillation more frequently than men. Female sex was independently associated with failed recanalization (aOR, 2.729; 95% CI, 1.334–5.582), which was an independent predictor of poor outcomes (aOR, 4.630; 95% CI, 1.882–11.389). Women were associated with poor outcomes in the analysis adjusted for confounders, except for failed recanalization (aOR, 2.285; 95% CI, 1.064–4.906). However, the association became insignificant in the additional analysis adjusted for failed recanalization (aOR, 1.670; 95% CI, 0.738–3.784). The indirect effect between female sex and poor outcomes via failed recanalization was statistically significant (aOR, 1.038; 95% CI, 1.010–1.127). Conclusion: Our study showed that failed recanalization mediated the association between women and poor outcomes after thrombectomy. Nonetheless, this might be explained by chance given our limited study population.

Publisher

Korean Neurocritical Care Society

Subject

Advanced and Specialized Nursing,Psychiatry and Mental health,Neurology (clinical)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3