Objective and subjective interproximal contact between the implant and the natural tooth-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Objective and subjective interproximal contact between the implant and the natural tooth

Published:2023 Issue:2 Volume:35 Page:53-62
ISSN:0915-6380
Container-title:The Showa University Journal of Medical Sciences
language:en
Short-container-title:Showa Univ J Med Sci

Author:

Aoki Masae¹,Sato Yuji¹,Osawa Tokiko¹

Affiliation:

1. Department of Geriatric Dentistry, Showa University School of Dentistry

Publisher

The Showa University Society

Subject

General Medicine

Link

https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/sujms/35/2/35_53/_pdf

Reference32 articles.

1. 1. Kasemo B, Lausmaa J. Metal selection and surface characteristics. In Branemark PI, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T, eds. Tissue-integrated prostheses: osseointegration in clinical dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence; 1985. pp99-116.

2. 2. Wei H, Tomotake Y, Nagao K, et al. Implant prostheses and adjacent tooth migration: preliminary retrospective survey using 3-dimensional occlusal analysis. Int J Prosthodont. 2008;21:302-304.

3. 3. Koori H, Morimoto K, Tsukiyama Y, et al. Statistical analysis of the diachronic loss of interproximal contact between fixed implant prostheses and adjacent teeth. Int J Prosthodont. 2010;23:535-540.

4. 4. Wat PY, Wong AT, Leung KC, et al. Proximal contact loss between implant-supported prostheses and adjacent natural teeth: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2011;105:1-4. （accessed 2019 Jan 15） Available from: https//doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913（10）00174-5.

5. 5. Byun SJ, Heo SM, Ahn SG, et al. Analysis of proximal contact loss between implant-supported fixed dental prostheses and adjacent teeth in relation to influential factors and effects. A cross-sectional study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26:709-714. （accessed 2019 Feb 23） Available from: https//doi.org/10.1111/clr.12373.