Affiliation:
1. İSTANBUL SAĞLIK VE TEKNOLOJİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ
Abstract
Design is a phenomenon encompassing multiple fields such as culture, technique, art, and sociology. The design, which constitutes a kind of buffer zone due to its position, exists in direct and indirect relations with the ipseity of life. In a multidisciplinary structure, the organization of inputs from each different field is one of the core elements at the heart of design. The designed object, on the other hand, is an entity emerging from the combination of culture and technique in terms of providing an aesthetic and ergonomic solution to the existing need and having the potency to shape the way of living and habit. The paradigms used in design fall outside the zeitgeist when created solely based on conventional data and pre-existing knowledge. The needs and culture that move alongside time also form the essence of culture. This formation, in fact, is a depiction of the way of life. The shaped environment, again, involves movement whether with places or metas; it evolves and changes with a dynamic nature. The design is also a phenomenon that shares this dynamism in the most basic sense and takes form within its own timeframe. The ability to use this dynamic nature either in a negative or positive direction finds existence under the responsibility of the designer. The design-related core that is created by the culture, once again, reaches a point where it creates the culture.
The purpose of this study is to interpret the role of the contemporary design object in our reality by discussing sections from the definitions of metas as well as from the meanings attributed to their social cores and contents within the design process from industrial production to our present day. In this regard, the study discusses the relevance and relation of the design to the concepts of culture, consumption, and meta. Moreover, based on the formation of the 21st-century modern world, this interpretation process provides an insight into the place where the design and designer stand and should stand.
Reference20 articles.
1. Arendt, H. (2012). Geçmişle Gelecek Arasında. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
2. Baudrillard, J. (2015). Tüketim Toplumu. İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları.
3. Confino, A. (1997). “Collective Memory and Cultural History: Problems of Method”, The American Historical Review, 102(5), 1386-1403.
4. Copleston, F. (2013). Aristoteles. İstanbul: İdea Yayınevi.
5. Douglas, M., & Isherwood, B. (2002). The World of Goods. Routledge. London&New York: Taylor&Francis Group.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献