Affiliation:
1. Department of Geotechnogenic Safety and Geoinformatics, Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical University of Oil and Gas, Ukraine. Email: dima_kasiyanchuk@ukr.net
2. 2Department of Geotechnogenic Safety and Geoinformatics, Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical University of Oil and Gas, Ukraine. Email: milashtohryn@gmail.com
Abstract
The dynamism of the landslides within the Carpathian region of Ukraine is because of the difficult engineering and geological conditions. High landslide den sity and significant population density contribute to the fact that environmental parameters worsen and require rational management. Permanent natural factors like clay flysch formation, fault tectonics, high seismic activity, and dense network of rivers mostly facilitate the active development of landslides in the Carpathian region. However, it is triggered by extreme long-term precipitation. The numerical parameters of population density, the landslide damage coefficient, and the predictive range of landslide intensification were selected to assess the ecological risk of damages in the area. The landslide dam age coefficient characterizes the tendency of the area to landslide development, considering all the factors contributing to the landslides. Risk, as a multifunctional calculated complex, includes the calculation of damage, according to which we can assess the possibility of risk for the human being while assuming the equal distribution of the population within the study area. The integral components of the risk are calculated based on the data gathered to assess the growth of risks in the future, considering the area distribution and predictive time series of the landslide intensification. This analysis has identified engineering and geological areas having the greatest risk to human life.
Reference20 articles.
1. Abella, E.A.C. and van Westen, C.J. (2007). Generation of a landslide risk index map for Cuba using spatial multi-criteria evaluation. Landslides, 4: 311–325. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-007-0087-y
2. Adamenko, O.M., Rudko, G.I. and Kovalchuk, I.P. (2000). Fakel. Ecological geomorphology: textbook.
3. Bondar, M.O. (2015). Estimation of risks of dangerous geological processes. Bulletin of the Mykhailo Ostrogradsky KrNU, 3(92): 123-128.
4. Bonnard, C., Forlati, F. and Scavia, C. (2004). Leiden: Balkema. Identification and mitigation of large landslide risks in Europe. Advances in risk assessment.
5. Corominas, J., van Westen, C., Frattini, P., Cascini, L., Malet, J., Fotopoulou, S., Catani, F., Mavrouli, O., Pitilakis, K. and Winter, M. (2014). Recommendations for the quantitative analysis of landslide risk. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 73(2): 209-263.DOI: https://doi.org/10.10007/s100-013-0538-8.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献