Inwigilacja w parlamencie. Analiza procesu legislacyjnego projektów dotyczących czynności operacyjno-rozpoznawczych w dobie rozwoju technologicznego

Author:

Kolaszyński Mateusz,Stolicki Dariusz

Abstract

SURVEILLANCE IN PARLIAMENT: AN ANALYSIS OF THE LEGISLATIVE PROCESS OF PROJECTS CONCERNING SECRET SURVEILLANCE IN THE ERA OF TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT Secret surveillance is one of the core activities of the intelligence services. Covert collection of information about individuals is often necessary for the effective performance of their tasks. On the other hand, the development of information technologies enables mass and virtually unlimited covert surveillance, thereby compromising democratic values such as privacy or transparency. Thus, balancing security and individual rights requires the creation of appropriate legal and political checks on surveillance. The responsibility for delineating the permissible boundaries of surveillance authorities rests primarily upon parliaments. However, Polish surveillance law tends to successively expand surveillance powers at the expense of the constitutional balance, as confirmed by multiple Constitutional Court rulings. One of the theories put forward to explain this fact is the regulatory capture theory, according to which legislators, through close cooperation with intelligence agency personnel, adopt the latter’s perspective and values, becoming co-opted to further their interests. This is exacerbated because the intelligence personnel has greater expertise on surveillance issues, and, as noted by J. Widacki, an exceptional capability to charm discussants, strong motives for exercising it, and substantial experience with significant successes in this area. This article seeks to ‘un-charm’ this area. Through a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods, and by reference to objective, measurable indicators, we seek to assess the extent of regulatory capture on the Polish legislative process in the area of secret surveillance, and thereby contribute to explaining the weakness of the legal and political checks on intelligence services in Poland.

Publisher

Ksiegarnia Akademicka Sp. z.o.o.

Subject

Metals and Alloys,Mechanical Engineering,Mechanics of Materials

Reference79 articles.

1. Absher K.M., Desch M., Popadiuk R., The President’s Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board, [w:] Oxford Handbook of National Security Intelligence, red. L. Johnson, Oxford 2010, https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195375886.003.0011.

2. Agencja Praw Podstawowych (FRA), Surveillance by Intelligence Services: Fundamental Rights Safeguards and Remedies in the EU, vol. 1: Member States’ Legal Frameworks, Luxembourg 2017.

3. Bigo D., Security, Surveillance and Democracy, [w:] Routledge Handbook of Surveillance Studies, red. K. Ball, K. Haggerty, D. Lyon, New York 2012.

4. Bodnar A. i in., Osiodłać Pegaza. Przestrzeganie praw obywatelskich w działaniach służb specjalnych – założenia reformy, 2019, [online] https://panoptykon.org/sites/default/files/osiodlac_pegaza_-_jak_powinien_wygladac_nadzor_nad_sluzbami._raport_ekspertow.pdf.

5. Caparini M., Controlling and Overseeing Intelligence Services in Democratic States, [w:] Democratic Control of Intelligence Services, red. M. Caparini, H. Born, London 2007, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315576442.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3