Can Memory and Truth Be Tailored by Law? Memory Law and the Right to the Truth in Rwanda

Author:

Myl-Chojnacka MałgorzataORCID

Abstract

The concept of memory laws has been gaining attention for the past few years. It is commonly defined as legal provisions governing history, including repressive measures against the denial of past crimes. Memory laws also include stateapprovedinterpretations of crucial historical events, the law establishing state holidays and commemoration of victims of past atrocities. The laws have a big part in transition and reconciliation, however, they may also lead to a distortion of historical truth. The main purpose of the paper is to analyse the coexistence between memory laws and the right to the truth in the context of human rights violations and international crimes. For that reason, firstly, the legal nature of the truth and memory under international law is evaluated. Secondly, the Rwandan legal provisions on genocide are analysed and comments are made on the elements of the Rwandan traditions concerning the past. That example serves to show the danger of the politicization of memory laws. Finally, the paper is an attempt to answer the question whether the conjunction of the right to the truth and memory laws is necessary.

Publisher

Ksiegarnia Akademicka Sp. z.o.o.

Reference50 articles.

1. Baranowska G., Gliszczyńska-Grabias A., “‘Right to Truth’ and Memory Laws: General Rules and Practical Implications,” Polish Political Science Yearbook, vol. 47, no. 1 (2018), pp. 97-109, https://dx.doi.org/10.15804/ppsy2018107.

2. Belavusau U., Gliszczyńska-Grabias A., “The Remarkable Risk of ‘Law and Historical Memory’ in Europe: Theorizing Trends and Prospects in the Recent Literature,” Journal of Law and Society, vol. 47, no. 2 (2020), pp. 325-338, https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.12228.

3. Berna M.B., “Argument in Favour of Identifying the Right to Truth as an Autonomous Prerogative within the General Theory of Human Rights,” Analele Universității Titu Maiorescu, vol. 31, no. 26 (2017), pp. 31-48.

4. Bucholc M., “Commemorative Lawmaking: Memory Frames of the Democratic Backsliding in Poland after 2015,” Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, vol. 11 (2019), pp. 85-110, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-018-0080-7.

5. Buckley-Zistel S., “We Are Pretending Peace: Local Memory and the Absence of Social Transformation and Reconciliation in Rwanda”, in P. Clark, Z.D. Kaufman (eds), After Genocide: Transitional Justice, Post-Conflict Reconstruction, and Reconciliation in Rwanda and beyond, New York 2009, pp. 153-171.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3