THE ETHICAL CONTEXT AS A HISTORICALLY SIGNIFICANT FACTOR OF RISK MANAGEMENT EFFICIENCY

Author:

Sachenko L. A.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. ‘Risk-profile’ LLC (Moscow, Russia)

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to identify ways to improve the effectiveness of risk management, thereby bridging the gap between the increasing needs of organisations and their current capabilities based on the study of past civilisational crises. To solve this task the main ethical factors that contributed to the success of bifurcation transitions in the past were identified through the analysis of turning points in history: the Upper Paleolithic Revolution, the Axial Age Revolution and the Industrial Revolution, using the model of minimum necessary social stability developed by the author based on the hypothesis of techno-humanitarian balance. Starting from the current position of the society on the eve of the next bifurcation transition, a comparative analysis of the ethical factors that made past successes possible with the current practice of risk management in organisations was carried out. The following factors were highlighted as priorities for the implementation in risk management practice: working together to achieve common goals, establishing and adhering to uniform rules for achieving common goals, and creating a favourable environment for the targeted use of human creative potential. As a result, a scheme has been proposed to complement current risk management practices by incorporating higher level ethical factors that promote rational goal setting, as well as involving the creative skills and efforts of lower level stakeholders in situational response. The proposed scheme can help to strengthen the impact of risk management, both for the organisations themselves and, indirectly, for society.

Publisher

Real Economy Publishing

Reference21 articles.

1. Berdyaev N. (2019). Appointment of a person. Experience of paradoxical ethics. Moscow, Amrita-Rus’. (In Russ.)

2. Dekart R. (2022). Discourse on the method and other writings. Moscow, AST. (In Russ.)

3. Moiseev N. (1990). Man and the noosphere. Moscow, Zhurnal ‘Ecology & Life’. (In Russ.)

4. Mun D., Popeta V. (2022). Prevention of man-made disasters. Book 1: Lessons of history. Moscow, Berlin, Direktmedia Pablishing. (In Russ.)

5. Nazaretyan A. (2001). Civilizational crises in the context of Universal History. Moscow, Kogito-Tsentr. (In Russ.)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3