FORMATION OF A VALUE PROPOSITION FOR CLIENTS: THEORETICAL APPROACHES AND UNDERSTANDING OF REPRESENTATIVES OF RUSSIAN COMPANIES

Author:

Trachuk A. V.1ORCID,Linder N. V.2ORCID,Tuaev V. O.3

Affiliation:

1. Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation (Moscow. Russia), “Goznak” JSC (Moscow. Russia)

2. Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation (Moscow. Russia)

3. «Unilever in Russia» JSC (Moscow, Russia)

Abstract

The paper is devoted to a comparative analysis of theoretical approaches to the formation of a value proposition and its understanding by representatives of Russian companies. The existing theoretical approaches to the formation of a value proposition are considered, as well as the main tools used in its formation in practice. To determine the theoretical approaches, more than 50 articles from leading economic journals were analyzed. To analyze the understanding of the value proposition, Russian companies conducted in–depth semi-structured interviews with managers of 84 Russian and foreign companies representing customer service departments, sales departments, innovation activities, strategic management, marketing and brand management departments.The analysis has shown that for most employees of companies, the concepts of a value approach in management and a value proposition are limited to standard categories, such as price, quality, and direct satisfaction of needs. This is especially true for representatives of Russian companies and firms that conduct their business only within Russia and CIS countries. While representatives of international companies noted the importance of the entire range of value formation tools in one way or another evenly, respondents from Russian companies clearly relied on product components and price in their answers. It should also be noted the leadership of product tools in both cases, and if Russian respondents focused only on the quality of the product in their answers, then representatives of international companies often noted the importance of the assortment and uniqueness of products.The result of the study was to determine the importance and place in the process of forming a value proposition of such tools as joint value creation with the consumer and the involvement of personnel in joint value creation.The author's approach to the formation of value proposition by companies is proposed in the article. The proposed matrix model allows you to quickly determine which factors and tools companies need to focus on first.

Publisher

Real Economy Publishing

Subject

Environmental Engineering

Reference51 articles.

1. Doyle P. (2001). Cost-oriented marketing. Transl. from Eng. St. Petersburg, Piter. (In Russ.)

2. Kotler F. (2008). 300 key marketing questions: Philip Kotler answers. Moscow, Olymp-business. (In Russ.)

3. Kotler F. (2006). Marketing management. Transl. from Eng. St. Petersburg, Piter. (In Russ.)

4. Lipsits I. (2007). Marketing for top managers. Moscow, Eksmo. (In Russ.)

5. Osterwalder A., Pinier Y., Bernarda G., Smith А. (2017). Development of value propositions. How to create goods and services that consumers will want to buy. Moscow, Alpina Publisher. (In Russ.)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3