Influence of Diabetes Mellitus on Long-Term Outcomes of Patients With Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Disease Treated With Either Drug-Eluting Stents or Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Influence of Diabetes Mellitus on Long-Term Outcomes of Patients With Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Disease Treated With Either Drug-Eluting Stents or Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Published:2015 Issue:1 Volume:56 Page:43-48
ISSN:1349-2365
Container-title:International Heart Journal
language:en
Short-container-title:Int. Heart J.

Author:

Yu Xianpeng¹,He Jiqiang¹,Luo Yawei¹,Yuan Fei¹,Song Xiantao¹,Gao Yuechun¹,Li Quan¹,Huang Fangjiong²,Gu Chengxiong²,Lv Shuzheng¹,Chen Fang¹

Affiliation:

1. Department of Cardiology, Beijing An Zhen Hospital, Capital Medical University

2. Department of Cardiac Surgery, Beijing An Zhen Hospital, Capital Medical University

Publisher

International Heart Journal (Japanese Heart Journal)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,General Medicine

Reference27 articles.

1. 1. Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. Circulation 2011; 124: e574-651.

2. 2. Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS); European Association for Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI), Wijns W, Kolh P, Danchin N, et al. Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J 2010; 31: 2501-55.

3. 3. Park DW, Seung KB, Kim YH, et al. Long-term safety and efficacy of stenting versus coronary artery bypass grafting for unprotected left main coronary artery disease: 5-year results from the MAIN-COMPARE (Revascularization for Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis: Comparison of Percutaneous Coronary Angioplasty Versus Surgical Revascularization) registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 56: 117-24.

4. 4. Serruys PW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, et al; SYNTAX Investigators. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 2009; 360: 961-72.

5. 5. Capodanno D, Stone GW, Morice MC, Bass TA, Tamburino C. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass graft surgery in left main coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical data. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 58: 1426-32.

Cited by 13 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With Left Main Disease With and Without Diabetes: Findings From a Pooled Analysis of 4 Randomized Clinical Trials;Circulation;2024-04-23

2. Long‐term outcomes of percutaneous versus surgical revascularization in patients with diabetes and left main coronary artery disease: A meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials;Journal of Cardiac Surgery;2022-10-19

3. Is Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) Surgery Still Preferable to Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) in View of Long-Term Outcomes among Diabetic Patients?;Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting;2022-09-28

4. The effect of diabetes on surgical versus percutaneous left main revascularization outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis;Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery;2022-04-01

5. Coronary Revascularization for Patients with Diabetes Mellitus;Annals of Surgery;2022-01-25