Predictors of New-Onset Physical Restraint Use in Critically Ill Adults

Author:

Lawson Thomas N.1,Tan Alai2,Thrane Susan E.3,Happ Mary Beth4,Mion Lorraine C.5,Tate Judith6,Balas Michele C.7

Affiliation:

1. Thomas N. Lawson is a doctoral student at The Ohio State University College of Nursing and an acute care nurse practitioner at The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.

2. Alai Tan is a research associate professor, The Ohio State University College of Nursing.

3. Susan E. Thrane is an assistant professor, The Ohio State University College of Nursing.

4. Mary Beth Happ is a professor and Associate Dean for Research and Innovation, The Ohio State University College of Nursing.

5. Lorraine C. Mion is a professor, The Ohio State University College of Nursing and a nurse scientist, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center.

6. Judith Tate is an assistant professor, The Ohio State University College of Nursing and a nurse scientist, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center.

7. Michele C. Balas is an associate professor, The Ohio State University College of Nursing.

Abstract

Background Physical restraints are frequently used for intensive care patients and are associated with substantial morbidity. The effects of common evidence-based critical care interventions on use of physical restraints remain unclear. Objective To identify independent predictors of new-onset use of physical restraints in critically ill adults. Methods Secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study involving 5 adult intensive care units in a tertiary care medical center in the United States. Use of physical restraints was determined via daily in-person assessments and medical record review. Mixed-effects logistic regression analysis was used to examine factors associated with new-onset use of physical restraints, adjusting for covariates and within-subject correlation among intensive care unit days. Results Of 145 patients who were free of physical restraints within 48 hours of intensive care unit admission, 24 (16.6%) had restraints newly applied during their stay. In adjusted models, delirium (odds ratio [OR], 5.09; 95% CI, 1.83-14.14), endotracheal tube presence (OR, 3.47; 95% CI, 1.22-9.86), and benzodiazepine administration (OR, 3.17; 95% CI, 1.28-7.81) significantly increased the odds of next-day use of physical restraints. Tracheostomy was associated with significantly lowered odds of next-day restraint use (OR, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.02-0.73). Compared with patients with a target sedation level, patients who were in a coma (OR, 2.56; 95% CI, 0.80-8.18) or deeply sedated (OR, 2.53; 95% CI, 0.91-7.08) had higher odds of next-day use of physical restraints, and agitated patients (OR, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.00-2.07) were less likely to experience restraint use. Conclusion Several potentially modifiable risk factors are associated with next-day use of physical restraints.

Publisher

AACN Publishing

Subject

Critical Care,General Medicine

Cited by 11 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3