Nurse-Driven Fluid Responsiveness Evaluation in Patients With Septic Shock: A Quality Improvement Initiative

Author:

Dilman Yana1,Bethel Claire2,Ramesh Navitha3,Myers Charlene4

Affiliation:

1. Yana Dilman is a critical care nurse practitioner in the medical-surgical intensive care unit at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC), Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania, and an adjunct clinical faculty member at Herzing University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

2. Claire Bethel is a Magnet Director at UPMC Community Osteopathic Hospital, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania.

3. Navitha Ramesh is an intensive care unit medical director at UPMC Community Osteopathic Hospital and the President of the Pennsylvania Chapter of the Society of Critical Care Medicine.

4. Charlene Myers is an associate professor and coordinator of the adult-gerontology acute care nurse practitioner track for master of science in nursing and doctor of nursing practice programs at the University of South Alabama College of Nursing, Mobile, Alabama.

Abstract

Background Fluid responsiveness should be assessed in patients with septic shock because only 50% of patients are fluid responsive. Dynamic measures of fluid responsiveness, like pulse pressure variation measured after a passive leg raise maneuver, are recommended to guide fluid administration in patients with sepsis after initial fluid resuscitation. Local Problem The purpose of the project was to evaluate outcomes after implementing a nurse-driven fluid responsiveness evaluation using passive leg raise and pulse pressure variation measurement in patients with septic shock. Methods The project included 30 adult patients with septic shock in a 24-bed medical-surgical intensive care unit at a community hospital. A new nursing process was initiated for bedside fluid responsiveness evaluation (pulse pressure variation measurement after passive leg raise). Staff members received in-person individual training sessions. Preintervention and 20-week postintervention patient outcomes data were collected to estimate the project’s impact on incidence of fluid overload and acute kidney injury, duration of mechanical ventilation, and intensive care unit length of stay. Preintervention and postintervention staff satisfaction surveys assessed nurses’ perception of the project’s value. Results Before intervention, 24 of 37 patients (65%) met criteria of fluid overload. The project resulted in a 28% decrease in the incidence of fluid overload. Staff satisfaction surveys revealed a significant increase in nurses’ feelings of empowerment to positively affect patient outcomes; all nurses agreed that the new process was efficient. Conclusion The results indicate that the project had a positive impact on patient outcomes and nurse autonomy.

Publisher

AACN Publishing

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3