Written Communication, Visitation Policies, and Awareness of Medical Issues Among Intensive Care Unit Families

Author:

Thinnes William E.1,Harrison Mitchell R.2,Basapur Santosh3,Weiss Matthew A.4,Quinn Thomas V.5,Ritz Ethan M.6,Shah Raj C.7,Greenberg Jared A.8

Affiliation:

1. William E. Thinnes is a pulmonary and critical care medicine fellow, Department of Internal Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.

2. Mitchell R. Harrison is a physician, Department of Internal Medicine, Centerpoint Medical Center, Independence, Missouri.

3. Santosh Basapur is an assistant professor, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.

4. Matthew A. Weiss is a critical care medicine fellow, Department of Internal Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.

5. Thomas V. Quinn is a physician, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Northwestern Medicine Palos Hospital, Palos Heights, Illinois.

6. Ethan M. Ritz is a statistician, Bioinformatics and Biostatistics Core, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.

7. Raj C. Shah is a professor, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, and Rush Alzheimer’s Disease Center, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.

8. Jared A. Greenberg is an assistant professor, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Internal Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.

Abstract

Background Open intensive care unit (ICU) visitation policies facilitate communication between clinicians and patients’ families. Restrictive visitation policies (eg, during a pandemic) may reduce families’ comprehension of information. Objectives To determine whether written communication increased awareness of medical issues among ICU families and whether the effect size depended on the visitation policies in place when participants were enrolled. Methods Families of ICU patients were randomly assigned to receive usual care with or without daily written patient care updates from June 2019 to January 2021. Participants were asked whether patients had experienced 6 ICU problems at up to 2 time points during the ICU stay. Responses were compared with the study investigators’ consensus. Results Of 219 participants, 131 (60%) were restricted from visiting. Participants in the written communication group were more likely than participants in the control group to correctly identify shock, renal failure, and weakness and were just as likely as participants in the control group to correctly identify respiratory failure, encephalopathy, and liver failure. Participants in the written communication group were more likely than participants in the control group to correctly identify the patient’s ICU problems when all 6 were grouped as a composite outcome, with the adjusted odds ratio of correct identification tending to be higher among participants enrolled during restricted versus open visitation periods: 2.9 (95% CI, 1.9-4.2; P < .001) vs 1.8 (95% CI, 1.1-3.1; P = .02), P = .17 for difference. Conclusions Written communication helps families correctly identify ICU issues. The benefit may be enhanced when families cannot visit the hospital. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03969810

Publisher

AACN Publishing

Subject

Critical Care Nursing,General Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3