Predictors of Adverse Events in Patients After Discharge From the Intensive Care Unit

Author:

Chaboyer Wendy1,Thalib Lukman2,Foster Michelle3,Ball Carol4,Richards Brent5

Affiliation:

1. Wendy Chaboyer is a professor and director of the Research Centre for Clinical and Community Practice Innovation, Griffith University Gold Coast Campus, Queensland, Australia.

2. Lukman Thalib is an associate professor in the Faculty of Medicine at the University of Kuwait, Safat, and is an adjunct professor with the Research Centre for Clinical and Community Practice Innovation, Griffith University Gold Coast Campus, Queensland, Australia.

3. Michelle Foster is the nurse unit manager of the intensive care unit at Gold Coast Hospital in Southport, Queensland, Australia.

4. Carol Ball is a consultant nurse in critical care at Royal Free Hospital in London, England.

5. Brent Richards is the executive director of the Division of Surgery and Critical Care at Gold Coast Hospital in Southport, Queensland, Australia.

Abstract

Background Patients discharged from the intensive care unit may be at risk of adverse events because of complex care needs.Objective To identify the types, frequency, and predictors of adverse events that occur in the 72 hours after discharge from an intensive care unit when no evidence of adverse events was apparent before discharge.Methods A predictive cohort study of 300 patients from an adult intensive care unit was undertaken. An internationally accepted protocol for chart audit was used. Frequency of adverse events was calculated, and logistic regression was used to determine independent predictors of adverse events.Results A total of 147 adverse events, 17 (11.6%) of which were defined as major, were incurred by 92 patients (30.7%). The 3 most common adverse events, hospital-incurred infection or sepsis (n = 32, 21.8%), hospital-incurred accident or injury (n = 17, 11.6%), and other complication such as deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary edema, or myocardial infarction (n = 17, 11.6%) accounted for 44.9% (n = 66) of all adverse events. Two predictors, respiratory rate less than 10/min or greater than or equal to 25/min and pulse rate exceeding 110/min, were significant independent predictors; requiring a high level of nursing care at the time of discharge was a significant predictor in univariate analysis but not in multivariate analysis.Conclusion Taking, recording, and reporting vital signs are important. Nursing care requirements of patients at discharge from the intensive care unit may be worthy of further investigation in studies of patients after discharge.

Publisher

AACN Publishing

Subject

Critical Care,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3