Precision-to-Tolerance Capability: An Important Consideration in Tight Glucose Control

Author:

Prinzing Catherine1,Rosenlund Sarah1,Sukeena Vicki1,Malinowski Cynthia1,Wise Lowell C.1

Affiliation:

1. Catherine Prinzing is a clinical nurse specialist for diabetes, Sarah Rosenlund is manager of the cardiovascular intensive care unit, Vicki Sukeena is the point-of-care testing coordinator, Cynthia Malinowski is a nurse educator in the cardiovascular intensive care unit, and Lowell C. Wise is a Six Sigma black belt at Trinity Health-Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical Center in Boise, Idaho.

Abstract

Objective To assess clinical implications of bias and variance of point-of-care glucometric measurements in cardiac surgery patients with wide variations in postoperative hematocrit.Methods Point-of-care glucose measurements were compared with values from laboratory analysis of the same sample of whole blood obtained from cardiac patients early on postoperative days 1 and 2. Twenty nurses collected 89 arterial blood samples from 58 patients during a 4-month period. Bias was measured by using difference scores between paired measurements. Patients were grouped within 5% increments according to hematocrit, and analysis of variance was used to test for differences. Variation was analyzed by precision-to-tolerance analysis within 3 euglycemic tolerance ranges.Results Laboratory glucose values were 62 to 224 mg/dL; point-of-care measures were 83 to 253 mg/dL. Bias was 10.85 mg/dL across all hematocrit groups. Pairs of laboratory and point-of-care glucose values differed significantly (t174 = 10.03; P < .001). Bias increased from −2.83 mg/dL for patients with hematocrits exceeding 39% to +16.71 mg/dL for patients with hematocrits between 20% and 24%. The standard deviation of difference scores was 11.59 mg/dL overall. The difference between 5% hematocrit groups was significant (F4 = 4.11; P = .004). Precision-to-tolerance capability ratios for specification limits of 70 to 300, 90 to 140, and 80 to 110 mg/dL were 0.30, 1.39, and 2.32, respectively.Conclusions The direction of bias change between hematocrit groupings was the direction predicted in the manufacturer’s information. Precision-to-tolerance measures indicated that the point-of-care equipment was not suitable for testing glucose within the planned “tighter” glycemic standards.

Publisher

AACN Publishing

Subject

Critical Care Nursing,General Medicine

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3