Choosing the Best Evidence to Guide Clinical Practice: Application of AACN Levels of Evidence

Author:

Peterson Mary H.1,Barnason Susan2,Donnelly Bill3,Hill Kathleen4,Miley Helen5,Riggs Lisa6,Whiteman Kimberly7

Affiliation:

1. Mary H. Peterson is an educator for Elsevier, Inc Live Review and Testing, Houston, Texas and a cardiovascular clinical nurse specialist.

2. Susan Barnason is director of the DNP program at the University of Nebraska Medical Center in Lincoln.

3. Bill Donnelly is a critical care staff nurse at Cooley Dickinson Hospital, Northampton, Massachusetts.

4. Kathleen Hill is a clinical nurse specialist in the surgical intensive care unit at Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.

5. Helen Miley is a specialty director adult-gero acute care nurse practitioner at Rutgers, The State University, Newark, New Jersey.

6. Lisa Riggs is director of cardiovascular quality at Saint Luke’s Hospital of Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri.

7. Kimberly Whiteman is codirector of the DNP program at Waynesburg University, Waynesburg, Pennsylvania.

Abstract

Evidence-based nursing care is informed by research findings, clinical expertise, and patients’ values, and its use can improve patients’ outcomes. Use of research evidence in clinical practice is an expected standard of practice for nurses and health care organizations, but numerous barriers exist that create a gap between new knowledge and implementation of that knowledge to improve patient care. To help close that gap, the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses has developed many resources for clinicians, including practice alerts and a hierarchal rating system for levels of evidence. Using the levels of evidence, nurses can determine the strength of research studies, assess the findings, and evaluate the evidence for potential implementation into best practice. Evidence-based nursing care is a lifelong approach to clinical decision making and excellence in practice.

Publisher

AACN Publishing

Subject

Critical Care Nursing,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3