Effect of pH Test-Strip Characteristics on Accuracy of Readings

Author:

Metheny Norma A.1,Gunn Emily M.2,Rubbelke Cynthia S.3,Quillen Terrilynn Fox4,Ezekiel Uthayashanker R.5,Meert Kathleen L.6

Affiliation:

1. Norma A. Metheny is a professor at St Louis University School of Nursing, St Louis, Missouri. She has conducted tube feeding research over the past 25 years.

2. Emily M. Gunn is an assistant professor at St Louis University School of Nursing. Her background is in medical-surgical nursing and she is currently serving in the role of clinical coordinator.

3. Cynthia S. Rubbelke is an assistant professor and the e-technology coordinator at St Louis University School of Nursing. She specializes in pediatric nursing and currently teaches in the clinical simulation laboratory.

4. Terrilynn Fox Quillen is a doctoral student at St Louis University School of Nursing and a community health nurse.

5. Uthayashanker R. Ezekiel is an associate professor, Biomedical Laboratory Science, St Louis University. He is a molecular biologist and has expertise in functional genomics.

6. Kathleen L. Meert is chief of pediatric critical care medicine at Children’s Hospital of Michigan and professor of pediatrics at Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.

Abstract

BACKGROUND Little is known about characteristics of colorimetric pH test strips that are most likely to be associated with accurate interpretations in clinical situations. OBJECTIVES To compare the accuracy of 4 pH test strips with varying characteristics (ie, multiple vs single colorimetric squares per calibration, and differing calibration units [1.0 vs 0.5]). METHODS A convenience sample of 100 upper-level nursing students with normal color vision was recruited to evaluate the accuracy of the test strips. Six buffer solutions (pH range, 3.0 to 6.0) were used during the testing procedure. Each of the 100 participants performed 20 pH tests in random order, providing a total of 2000 readings. The sensitivity and specificity of each test strip was computed. In addition, the degree to which the test strips under- or overestimated the pH values was analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS Our criterion for correct readings was an exact match with the pH buffer solution being evaluated. Although none of the test strips evaluated in our study was 100% accurate at all of the measured pH values, those with multiple squares per pH calibration were clearly superior overall to those with a single test square. CONCLUSIONS Test strips with multiple squares per calibration were associated with greater overall accuracy than test strips with a single square per calibration. However, because variable degrees of error were observed in all of the test strips, use of a pH meter is recommended when precise readings are crucial.

Publisher

AACN Publishing

Subject

Critical Care,General Medicine

Cited by 13 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3