An Efficiency Evaluation of Protocols for Tight Glycemic Control in Intensive Care Units

Author:

Malesker Mark A.1,Foral Pamela A.1,McPhillips Ann C.1,Christensen Keith J.1,Chang Julie A.1,Hilleman Daniel E.1

Affiliation:

1. Mark A. Malesker and Pamela A. Foral are associate professors, Keith J. Christensen is an assistant professor, and Daniel E. Hilleman is a professor in the Department of Pharmacy Practice, and Julie A. Chang is a clinical fellow in the Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Internal Medicine, Creighton University Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska. Ann C. McPhillips is a critical care/clinical educator at Alegent Health Immanuel Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska.

Abstract

Background The efficiency of protocols for tight glycemic control is uncertain despite their adoption in hospitals. Objectives To evaluate the efficiency of protocols for tight glycemic control used in intensive care units. Methods Three separate studies were performed: (1) a third-party observer used a stopwatch to do a time-motion analysis of patients being treated with a protocol for tight glycemic control in 3 intensive care units, (2) charts were retrospectively reviewed to determine the frequency of deviations from the protocol, and (3) a survey assessing satisfaction with and knowledge of the protocol was administered to full-time nurses. Results Time-motion data were collected for 454 blood glucose determinations from 38 patients cared for by 47 nurses. Mean elapsed times from blood glucose result to therapeutic action were 2.24 (SD, 1.67) minutes for hypoglycemia and 10.65 (SD, 3.24) minutes for hyperglycemia. Mean elapsed time to initiate an insulin infusion was 32.56 (SD, 12.83) minutes. Chart review revealed 734 deviations from the protocol in 75 patients; 57% (n = 418) were deviations from scheduled times for blood glucose measurements. The mean number of deviations was approximately 9 per patient. Of 60 nurses who responded to the workload survey, 42 (70%) indicated that the protocol increased their workload; frequency of blood glucose determinations was the most common reason. Conclusions Nurses spend substantial time administering protocols for tight glycemic control, and considerable numbers of deviations occur during that process. Further educational efforts and ongoing assessment of the impact of such protocols are needed.

Publisher

AACN Publishing

Subject

Critical Care,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3