Activated Partial Thromboplastin Times From Venipuncture Versus Central Venous Catheter Specimens in Adults Receiving Continuous Heparin Infusions

Author:

Dailey Mary Sue1,Berger Barbara2,Dabu Fortunata3

Affiliation:

1. Mary Sue Dailey is a clinical nurse specialist at Advocate Good Samaritan Hospital in Downers Grove, Illinois.

2. Barbara Berger is a faculty member at the University of Illinois at Chicago College of Nursing and consults on evidence-based practice and clinical research.

3. Fortunata Dabu is a nurse clinician at Advocate Good Samaritan Hospital. She is certified in medical-surgical nursing.

Abstract

BackgroundIn patients receiving heparin infusions, variations in specimen collection technique may contribute to inaccurate measurements of activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT).ObjectivesTo determine if there is a difference in aPTT results between specimens collected from a central venous access device (CVAD) compared with venipuncture in patients receiving heparin infusions.MethodsSimultaneous blood samples (CVAD vs venipuncture) from 66 patients receiving continuous heparin infusions were compared.ResultsThe mean aPTT difference (peripheral aPTT minus CVAD aPTT) was −7.3 seconds (P=.07). Neither length of time heparin was turned off (P=.18) nor waste volume (P=.32) was significantly associated with the difference in aPTT. The median aPTT difference when the CVAD specimen was obtained from the heparin infusion port was −20.5 seconds, compared with −0.1, −3.0, and −0.2 seconds for specimens from a port proximal to, distal to, or coterminal with the heparin infusion, respectively (P=.008).ConclusionsUse of this protocol resulted in similar aPTTs when the CVAD specimen was not obtained from the heparin infusion port. However, obtaining the specimen from the heparin infusion port resulted in significantly higher aPTT values.

Publisher

AACN Publishing

Subject

Critical Care,General Medicine

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3