Third (Anglo-Common Law) Countries and Rome II: Dilemma or Deliverance?-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Third (Anglo-Common Law) Countries and Rome II: Dilemma or Deliverance?

Published:2011-08 Issue:2 Volume:7 Page:361-392
ISSN:1744-1048
Container-title:Journal of Private International Law
language:en
Short-container-title:Journal of Private International Law

Author:

Schoeman Elsabe¹

Affiliation:

1. BLC, LLB, LLD, Associate Professor, University of Auckland. I would like to thank Paul Myburgh for reading this article in draft and offering valuable insights. I would also like to thank two anonymous reviewers for constructive comments and suggestions, as well as Mary Keyes for sharing her views on contract choice of law in Australia with me.

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Subject

Law,Political Science and International Relations

Link

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.5235/174410411796868698

Reference153 articles.

1. [2005] HCA 54.

2. [2006] UKHL 32.

3. As well as Rome I (Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 on the law applicable to contractual obligations, [2008] OJ L177/6 (hereinafter “Rome I”)), having earlier opted into Brussels I (Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters, [2001] OJ L12/1 (hereinafter “Brussels I“)).

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Lessons from choice of law in tort in Israel: the rise and fall of the “contacts” approach; the fortuitousness exception and rejection of the common habitual residence exception;Journal of Private International Law;2015-09-02

2. Choice of Law For Tort in Canada: Reasons for Change;Journal of Private International Law;2013-08-21

3. Convergence and Divergence in Private International Law;Journal of Private International Law;2011-12