Efficiency of surgical treatment methods for chronic tonsillitis in a comparative perspective

Author:

Egamberdieva Z.,Nurmukhamedova F.,Jabbarova D.,Salomov K.

Abstract

Background: Tonsillectomy is a common surgical procedure performed for various indications, and different techniques have been developed for its execution. One such method is coblation, which utilizes controlled radiofrequency energy to remove tonsil tissue. In this study, we compared coblation with a new monopolar electrosurgical extracapsular tonsillectomy technique. Methods: A prospective clinical investigation was conducted at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology at the "Happy Life" Clinic. The study included 45 patients aged 6–18 years who had undergone extracapsular coblation and monopolar electrosurgical tonsillectomy for chronic tonsillitis. Data regarding age, gender, disease duration, operation duration, estimated intraoperative blood loss, postoperative pain assessment, post-tonsillectomy hemorrhage (PTH), and complications were collected. Results: Coblation exhibited significantly lower average pain scores than the monopolar technique on the first (p < 0.001) and second postoperative days (p = 0.02). However, pain assessments were comparable at all other time points. The monopolar group had significantly shorter operation times (16.09 ± 6.53 minutes) compared to the coblation group (20.12 ± 5.12 minutes, p < 0.001). Intraoperative blood loss did not significantly differ between the groups (p = 0.39). PTH occurred in 6 patients (13.3%) and required surgical intervention. Secondary PTH rates were 4.44% (2/45) and 2.2% (1/45) in the coblation and monopolar therapy groups, respectively (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Coblation and the new monopolar electrosurgical extracapsular tonsillectomy exhibited similar postoperative pain outcomes, except for the first and second postoperative days. Nevertheless, the monopolar technique provides substantial advantages with shorter operation times, reduced secondary PTH risk, and cost-effectiveness, making it a preferred choice, particularly in resource-constrained settings.

Publisher

Scientific Publishing Center InterConf

Subject

General Chemical Engineering

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3