On the religious identification of new religious communities: instrumentation problem

Author:

Riazanova Svetlana1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Humanitarian Studies PFRC UB RAS, Perm, Russia

Abstract

The study is dedicated to the issue of identification of local religious communities that have emerged in recent decades and that seem to be syncretistic. The main research question of the article is how to establish basic identification criteria that could become the basis for compiling a classification or typology. Two strategies for identifying communities are explored: one is based on using a number of external markers, another one relies on self-identification of the bearers of religious consciousness and their internal definitions. The first strategy was chosen as the key one due to being less subjective; the second one was utilized as a means of additional verification. As research objects that can be defined as belonging to the same series, two local communities have been selected that arose at the end of the last century on the territory of the outer Kama region and evolved from Orthodox communities to another type of associations. Methodologically the study is based on the materials resulting from the author’s field research (participant observation, expert interviews, semi-structured interviews with former community members and its current leaders, excerpts from the author’s personal correspondence with believers), data from journalistic investigations, statutory documents and websites of both organizations in different periods of time. The doctrinal part of the teachings of both groups and lived rituals practiced by them were chosen as primary objects for analysis. The research shows that both communities in question cannot be defined as belonging to the Christian tradition due to the specifics of the dogma, the use of some magical practices, and the presence of elements of secular culture. The specificity of the ideas and rituals of each of the groups demonstrates that classifications and broad definitions are not applicable to associations of their kind. It seems more appropriate not to place these groups into a class of religious associations of a new type (new religious movements), but to define them as new social groups positioned at the junction of religious and non-religious spheres of public life.

Publisher

Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (FCTAS RAS)

Reference41 articles.

1. Ryazanova S. V. Secular forms of modern religiosity: the evolution of social myth. Naučnyj ežegodnik Instituta filosofii i prava UrO RAN. 2011;(11):64–79. (In Russ.).

2. Ryazanova S. V. The structure of contemporary religious consciousness: the general and the specific. Vestnik NGU. Seriya: Filosofiya. 2012;10(3):197–204. (In Russ.).

3. Ryazanova S. V. Myth in its correlation with religious and secular types of worldview. Naučnyj ežegodnik Instituta filosofii i prava UrO RAN. 2012;(12):123–136. (In Russ.).

4. Ryazanova S. V. Continuum and time in myth. Vestnik Permskogo nauchnogo tsentra UrO RAN. 2014;(4):37–44. (In Russ.).

5. Smirnov M. Yu. Is it possible to abandon the concept of religiosity in the study of religion? Vestnik Russkoj hristianskoj gumanitarnoj akademii. 2015;16(2):145–153. (In Russ.).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3