Affiliation:
1. Institute of Socio-Political Research of FCTAS RAS, Moscow, Russia
2. Institute of Socio-Political Research of FCTAS RAS; Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, Moscow, Russia
Abstract
The article is devoted to the problem of gender equality in politics and the representation of women in legislative bodies in Europe. The authors draw attention to the fact that the role of women in the European political landscape is increasing against the background of the crisis of traditional political parties. There is a relationship between the percentage of women involved in the work of legislative bodies and the political orientation of the parties that nominated them. As a hypothesis, the idea is accepted that the countries with the highest gender equality index and strong positions of social democratic parties are main donors for women in politics. Populist parties are mainly supporters of classical European traditionalism, therefore, in countries with strong right-wing populist parties’ women are less represented and there is an uneven distribution of legislative seats in favor of men.
By analysing the empirical base (electoral statistics and discourse analysis), the authors come to the conclusion that gender parity has not been achieved in the most European countries. The most effective way to enforce women representation in the European legislative bodies is to implement quotas at the level of national legislation, as well as to use of voluntary party quotas. However, the artificial nomination of weak female candidates who do not find support among voters and thus ensure guaranteed electability for strong male candidates. This is especially true for right-wing populist political parties, furthermore this trend is typical for most European countries. In addition to quotas, the European countries use special educational and social policies to minimise the pressure of gender stereotypes and expand the practice of women's political participation at all levels of government, which has yielded positive results; in today's convocation of the European Parliament, women are represented more than in previous convocations.
Publisher
Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (FCTAS RAS)
Reference24 articles.
1. Anselmi, M. (2017) Populism. An introduction. London, Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. 130 p. ISBN 978-1315268392 (in Eng.).
2. Castells, М. (2016) Communication power. Moscow, HSE Publ. 564 p. ISBN 978-5-7598-1009-4 (in Russ.).
3. Fonow, M. M., Cook, J. A., Jorge, J. A. (2005) Feminist methodology: new applications in the academy and public policy. Signs Journal of Women in Culture and Society. Vol. 30. No. 4. Pp. 2211-2236. DOI 10.1086/428417 (in Eng.).
4. Glas, S., Spierings, N., Lubbers, M., Scheepers, P. (2019) how polities shape support for gender equality and religiosity’s impact in Arab countries. European Sociological Review. Vol. 35. No. 3. Pp. 299–315. DOI 10.1093/esr/jcz004 (in Eng.).
5. Agbalajobi, D. T., Oluwalogbon, L. A. (2019) The Nigerian senate and the politics of the non-passage of the gender equality bill. African Journal of Political Science and International Relations. Vol. 13(3). Pp. 17-23. DOI 10.5897/AJPSIR2019.1150 (in Eng.).
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献