The dialogue between a government and society in the digital age

Author:

Gadzhiev Khanlar1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. RSUH; RANEPA, Moscow, Russia

Abstract

A dialogue between a government and society is the principal realization of which is declared in many of modern states. Though such dialogue can occur only when authorities make it possible for the mechanisms and channels of political feedback to function successfully which allows to identify, analyze, understand and take into account social demands and the current problematic field of the society while working out a political course. In the era of digitalization when the new technologies continue to permanently change the basic spheres of the society this question has become more urgent. Political-administrative sphere is not an exception and today digital technologies of political participation and governmental services providing. Though the question to what extent these steps change the essence of policy, political governing and political regimes (primarily the democracies) and the dialogue between government and society. Particularly the statement that digitalization of the political-administrative process is a step towards establishing democracy of a new type raises doubts. The latter creates opportunities for fundamentally different significant opportunities for citizens to participate in public decision-making. For answering the question, the article looks into the nature and peculiarities of a social-governmental dialogue, the gist and the principals of democracy, the limits of modifying democracy towards factual increasing of the role of the society in taking part of political administrative decision making; the possibility of realization of the principles of a deliberative democracy is being considered.

Publisher

Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (FCTAS RAS)

Reference23 articles.

1. Gadzhiev, Kh. A. (2021) Political feedback in conditions of social digitalization. Science. Culture. Society. Vol. 27. No. 1. Pp. 8-20. DOI 10.19181/nko.2021.27.1.1 (in Russ).

2. Easton, D. A. (1957) An approach to the analysis of political systems. World Politics. Vol. 9. No. 3. Pp. 383-400. DOI 10.2307/2008920 (in Eng.).

3. Zaitsev, A. V. (2020) Dialogue between the state and civil society: on the issue of identification and typologization. Socio and Political Research. No. 1 (6). Pp. 5-16. DOI 10.20323/2658-428X-2020-1-6-5-16 (in Russ).

4. Bessette, J. M. (1997) The mild voice of reason: Deliberative democracy and American national government. Chicago, University of Chicago Press. 306 p. ISBN 978-0226044248 (in Eng.).

5. Habermas, J. (1989) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Massachusetts, MIT press. 301 p. ISBN 0-262-08180-6 (in Eng.).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3