Affiliation:
1. Institute of Socio-Economic Studies of Population of the Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
2. Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
Abstract
The transition to a market economy implied the creation of opportunities for individuals to realize entrepreneurial talent. Over the past thirty years, the interest of young people in doing business has noticeably decreased. At the same time, in the conditions of the labor market compression caused by the crisis, increasing competition for available vacancies, the idea of starting own business may be attractive. The article is based on the results of a large-scale sociological study, which included a mass survey of students of the Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, a series of semi-structured interviews with experts and focus group interviews with students. It shows how students feel about entrepreneurship, how right they are, according to experts, in their expectations, and how the discovered ideas and attitudes can affect the development of the economy. According to the survey results, a third of students think about their own business as a way to achieve financial well-being. Young people mostly do not see their relatives and friends as their business partners, since they prefer to conduct business on a formal basis, which they see as a certain guarantee against unfair actions of partners. At the same time, the results suggest that the protection of private property and, first of all, business, is clearly insufficient for young people. This corresponds to their ideas about the disinterest of key economic actors in fair market competition, demonopolization of the economy, reduction of corruption in the public administration system, judicial and law enforcement agencies. Experts express skepticism about the possibility of the majority of young people to open and keep afloat their business, and attribute this to a shortage of material and educational resources, and most importantly — of the social capital that corresponds to the specifics of the current economic system.
Publisher
Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (FCTAS RAS)
Subject
General Materials Science
Reference13 articles.
1. Aleksandrova O. A. Stanet li pokoleniye «pepsi» pokoleniyem «next»? [Will the "Pepsi" generation become the "Next" generation?] Chelovecheskiy potentsial modernizatsii Rossii: Strategiya operezhayushchego razvitiya [Human Potential of Modernization of Russia: The Strategy of Advanced Development]. Eds. A. V. Buzgalin, A. I. Kolganov. Moscow. URSS, LENAND. 2006. Р.190-191. (in Russ.)
2. Lewis K. Identity Capital: An Exploration in the Context of Youth Social Entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development. 2016. Vol. 28. No. 3-4. P. 191-205. DOI: 10.1080/08985626.2016.1155741
3. Hermes J., Koch K., Bakhuisen N., Borghuis P. This is My Life: The Stories of Independent Workers in the Creative Industries in the Netherlands. Javnost — The Public. 2017. Vol. 24. No. 1. P. 87-101. DOI: 10.1080/13183222.2017.1280892
4. Sandoval M. From Passionate Labour to Compassionate Work: Cultural Co-Ops, Do What You Love and Social Change. European Journal of Cultural Studies. 2018. Vol. 21. No. 2. P. 113-129. DOI: 10.1177/1367549417719011
5. Glukhikh P. L., Voronina L. V., Ivanova A. V. Predprinimatel'skaya kul'tura molodezhi i faktory yeye razvitiya: sotsiokul'turnyy podkhod [Youth entrepreneurial culture and factors of its development: a sociocultural approach]. Upravlenets [The Manager]. 2016. No. 3(61). P. 52-61. (in Russ.)