Comparative analysis of the capabilities of WoS and eLibrary for analyzing bibliographic networks

Author:

Maltseva Daria1ORCID,Pavlova Irina1ORCID,Kapustina Lika1,Vashchenko Vasilisa1,Fiala Dalibor2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. HSE University, Moscow, Russia

2. West Bohemian University, Pilsen,Czech Republic

Abstract

This article presents a comparative analysis of two major scientific publication databases: Web of Science Core Collection and eLibrary – to identify their differences and unique opportunities for exploration of bibliographic networks of Russian scientific authors. Current shortage of tools and approaches for collection, processing and analysis of bibliographic data in the Russian language constitutes the relevance of this study. Empirical analysis is based on comparison of respective arrays of scientific publications in the field of sociology over the period of 2010-2021. We propose a set of comparison criteria including those related to the procedure of data access, quality of data management, quantitative and qualitative features of the data. Inspection of the databases based on the proposed criteria aids in identification of intersections between both the collections and the respective qualitative observations about them. We make conclusions regarding the comparative advantages and weaknesses of both databases in regards to their potential as the sole data source for bibliographic studies, and make recommendations for their effective use in research on Russian science.

Publisher

Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (FCTAS RAS)

Reference21 articles.

1. Bar-Ilan J. Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century – A review, Journal of informetrics. 2008, vol. 2, p. 1–52. DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2007.11.001.

2. Mingers J., Leydesdorff L. A review of theory and practice in scientometrics, European journal of operational research, 2015, vol. 246, no. 1, p. 1–19. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2015.04.002.

3. Rousseau R., Egghe L., Guns R. Becoming metric-wise: A bibliometric guide for researchers, ed. by W. Glänzel [et al.]. Cambridge, MA: Chandos Publishing, 2018. 850 p. ISBN: 0081024754, 9780081024751.

4. Batagelj V., Doreian P., Ferligoj A., Kejžar N. Understanding large temporal networks and spatial networks: Exploration, pattern searching, visualization and network evolution. Hoboken, NJ: WileyBlackwell, 2014, 464 p. ISBN: 978-1-118-91537-0.

5. Moiseev S.P., Maltseva D.V. Source selection for systematic literature reviews: a comparison of expert and algorithmic approaches (in Russian), Sotsiologiya 4M (Sociology: methodology, methods, mathematical modeling), 2018, no. 47, p. 7–43.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3