Vignette Method in Online Research: Measuring Perceptions of Fairness

Author:

Kalinin Roman1ORCID

Affiliation:

1.

Abstract

The article covers the use of the vignette method in online research. The possibilities of the method based on the measurement of the perception of justice are demonstrated and the tools developed for these purposes are evaluated. The analysis of the quality of the proposed scales is carried out using quantitative assessments of the main psychometric indicators: constructive and criterion validity. The substantiation and calculation of these indicators are described in detail, as well as the interpretation of the obtained values. A moderate indicator of construct validity and a satisfactory indicator of criterion validity indicate the need for further optimisation of the scales. Special attention is paid to the peculiarities of using this method online with the help of participants recruited from a commercial panel of test subjects. The paradata are analysed and the dependence of the meaningful results of the study on the non-semantic aspects of the tools is traced. In particular, the influence of the interaction between the order of presentation of stimuli and the type of devices on judgments about fairness is demonstrated. It is shown that participants who completed tasks using mobile devices tend to consider the conditions that they were shown first to be more fair. In contrast to participants who performed tasks on desktop devices, where this effect is practically not observed. Recruiting participants from an online panel for a study using the vignette method demonstrated a number of limitations that should be considered when designing a study. Given the demonstrated inattention of participants when completing tasks from mobile devices, it is recommended to limit the completion of questionnaires to the use of desktop devices - computers and laptops. Also, unlike previous studies in this area, when using the vignette method, it is recommended to limit the number of levels of factors in the experimental plan to reduce the cognitive complexity of tasks in the conditions of the inability to control the attentiveness of their performance. The results obtained are analysed in the context of methodological research. Methodological solutions are proposed for using the online vignette method, current and possible sources of data distortion are indicated, and recommendations are given for the further use of the developed tools.

Publisher

Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (FCTAS RAS)

Subject

General Medicine

Reference43 articles.

1. Bykov A. V. Factorial Vignettes Method and Self-Report Altruism Scale: Comparison of Online and Offline Surveys. Sotsiologiya: metodologiya, metody, matematicheskoye modelirovaniye, 2014: 39: 62–98 (in Russ.).

2. Vlasov M. S., Protasova I. N. Vignettes as a Measure of Moral Foundations. Vestnik Altayskogo Gosudarstvennogo Pedagogicheskogo Universiteta, 2018: 37: 71–75 (in Russ.).

3. Goodwin С. J. Research in Psychology: Methods and Design. St. Petersburg, Piter, 2004: 558 (in Russ.).

4. Kalinin R. G. Distributive Justice Research in Social Sciences: A Review of Conceptualizations and Methodological Approaches. Sotsiologiya: metodologiya, metody, matematicheskoye modelirovaniye, 2019: 49: 7–56 (in Russ.).

5. Puzanova Zh. V., Tertyshnikova A. G. Vignette Method in Sociological Research: Methodological Principles and Techniques. Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Ser.: Sotsiologiya, 2015: 4: 4: 44–56 (in Russ.).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3