Affiliation:
1. Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology; Gaidar Institute of Economic Policy, Moscow, Russia
2. Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology; National Research University "Higher School of Economics", Moscow, Russia
Abstract
Ensuring technological self-sufficiency has become a systemic task of the State. Weunderstand technological self-sufficiency as the ability of the state to ensure scientific, technologicaland industrial development for creating and maintaining on its territory its own technologiesand infrastructure sufficient to guarantee independence from foreign technologiesin critical, vital areas.In this article, we propose conceptual approaches for formation of technological self-sufficiencyin Russia and assess potential and conditions of its development. The theoretical basis ofour concept is linked to the idea of technological leapfrogging. The notion of a technologicalleap implies that the catching-up country is able to follow the leaders at an accelerated pace,and even to find its own trajectory of technological development.The conceptual framework for technological self-sufficiency based on technological leapfroggingincludes the choice of thematic priorities and the organization of cooperative projects,preferably based on competition, to minimize the risks of technological failures. Since thepolicy of technological leapfrogging is expensive, budget funding plays an important role inthe first 5-7 years. It can be provided through both special programs and institutes for development.The assessment of the current situation in Russia shows that the technological leapfroggingis possible based on consortiums with the participation of medium-sized fast-growing companies,and in the field of production tools – based on individual groups able to develop andproduce domestic scientific equipment. However, the reorientation of scientific potential will take some time, especially when there isa high risk of an outflow of the most qualified personnel from the country. It is also importantto implement measures aimed at strengthening cooperative linkages, which are still underdeveloped.
Publisher
Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (FCTAS RAS)
Reference19 articles.
1. Fagerberg, J. and Godinho, M. M. (2005). Innovation and Catching-up. In: The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Ed. by D. C. Mowery, J. Fagerberg, R. R. Nelson. P. 514–543. New York: Oxford University Press.
2. Intellectual Property Rights, Development, and Catch up: An International Comparative Study (2010). Ed. by H. Odagiri, A. Goto, A. Sunami, R. R. Nelson. London: Oxford University Press.
3. Malerba, F. and Nelson, R.R. (2011). Learning and Catching-up in Different Sectoral Systems: Evidence from Six Industries. Industrial and Corporate Change. Vol. 20, no. 6. P. 1645–1675. DOI: https://doi-org.eres.qnl.qa/10.1093/icc/dtr062.
4. Malerba, F. and Lee, K. (2021). An Evolutionary Perspective on Economic Catchup by Latecomers. Industrial and Corporate Change. Vol. 30, no. 4. P. 986–1010. DOI: 10.1093/icc/dtab008.
5. Athreye, S. and Godley, A. (2009). Internationalization and Technological Leapfrogging in the Pharmaceutical Industry. Industrial and Corporate Change. Vol. 18, no. 2. P. 295–323. DOI: 10.1093/icc/dtp002.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献