Competition: Provision or Barrier for the Growth of Scientific Knowledge?

Author:

Tambovtsev Vitaly1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia

Abstract

The aim of the article is to analyze the competition concept’s content in science and the relationship between differences in this content and estimates of the competition impact on the growth of scientific knowledge. It is shown that at present there are two types of competition in science: “natural”, inseparable from the scientific knowledge production process, and “artificial”, generated by the widespread introduction of neoliberal science policy in different countries. The first type of competition exists between the creators of new scientific knowledge, the second one – between individuals called upon to perform the supportingfunctions necessary for the scientific knowledge production. Competing for their positions in bureaucratic hierarchies, these individuals use measures that give rise to various forms of researchers’ misconduct that damage the scientific knowledge production processes. It is concluded that the distinction between two types of competition in science will allow a more detailed and correct analysis of the processes taking place in science as a whole and in research organizations.

Publisher

Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (FCTAS RAS)

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3