The Options of Scientific Research Assessment Under Sanctions

Author:

Kurdin Alexander1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia

Abstract

The article is devoted to the comparative analysis of the options of scientific research assessment in Russia under circumstances of 2022. The accent is put on the sphere of social sciences. In recent times the key factor of scientific research assessment was the publication activity, in particular – the quantity and the quality of articles in scientific journals. Meanwhile, the important problem was the existence of two discourses in social sciences in Russia – the Russian discourse and the global one. It restricted the integrity of the assessment system. The significant positive trend was presented by the convergence between these discourses, which was, however, stopped by the events of the first months of 2022. The escalation of the international conflict had an impact on the global academic communication, put under question the opportunity of scientific research assessment on the base of publications in journals from the international collections. The necessity of research assessment modernization increases the risks of rejection of the publications’ priority in general, which can lead to the growth of costs and the decline of assessment quality. At the same time, the desirable conservation of publications as a key criterion of scientific results requires the modification of publicationactivity consideration. The recommended option is the transition towards the quasinational collection of journals. It will de facto include journals from the international collections, as well as journals from “the core of Russian scientific citation index”. This option permits to maintain incentives for publications abroad and, consequently, contributes to the maintenance of connections with the global science. It will also raise the integrity of publications system in general. But the transition will require to solve several technical and administrative problems. We will need additional regulations of the quasinational publications system and the introduction of new instruments into this system. The elaboration of the common quasinational collection together with friendly nations may be considered as an additional option

Publisher

Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (FCTAS RAS)

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3