Knowledge for Evidence-based Economic Policy: Supply and Demand

Author:

Shastitko Andrey1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Lomonosov Moscow State University; The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Moscow, Russia

Abstract

Based on the idea of a positive relationship between the growth of scientific economic knowledge and economic development, through the prism of the types of discourse in which Russian researchers are involved, the issue of barriers to building an effective system of economic science management, which is necessary for evidence-based economic policy, is discussed. It is necessary for evidence-based economic policy. The first type of discourse is intradisciplinary and is associated with the interaction of various research programs. The second and third types of discourse – internal and external - have a geographical dimensionand reflect the target audience and the research agenda. Some principles are formulated on the basis of which an effective system of management of Russian economic science in terms of the content of ongoing research can be built. The features, comparative advantages and failures of the Coasean approach in economic research are noted in the context of developing recommendations for economic policy in the light of the interaction of competence centers with government bodies.

Publisher

Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (FCTAS RAS)

Reference13 articles.

1. Ivanova, O. S., Plaksin, S. M. and Shastitko, A. E. (2009). Praktika ispolneniya gosudarstvennyi funktsii (polnomochii) s privlecheniem ekspertov i ekspertnykh organizatsii [The practice of performing state functions (powers) with the involvement of experts and expert organizations]. Moscow: Max Press publ. 126 p. (In Russ.).

2. Shastitko, A. E. (2009). Problemy ispol’zovaniya ekspertnogo znaniya v realizatsii gosudarstvennykh funktsii [Problems of using expert knowledge in the implementation of state functions]. Public Administration Issues. No. 1. P. 85–108. (In Russ.).

3. Enikolopov, R. S. (2020). Evidence based development economics: Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences 2019. Voprosy Ekonomiki. No. 1. P. 5–17. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2020-1-5-17 (In Russ.).

4. Better Living Through Economics [Russ. ed.: Kak ekonomicheskaya nauka pomogaet sdelat’ nashu zhizn’ luchshe] (2011). Ed. by J. Siegfried; transl. from Eng. N. Edelman. Moscow: Gaidar Institute publ. 432 p. (In Russ.).

5. Shastitko, A. E. and Pavlova, N. S. (2022). Pigouvian vs. Coasian approach: Ideas, values, perspectives. Voprosy Ekonomiki. No. 1. P. 23–46. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2022-1-23-46 (In Russ.).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3